HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
'R. maximowicziana' rose References
Book  (1 May 2003)  Includes photo(s).
 
Shrubs small, with long repent branches... prickles scattered, curved,... flat, gradually tapering to broad base; bristles and smaller prickles sometimes present. Leaves including petiole 4–11 cm; stipules... lanceolate, margin irregularly serrate and glandular-pubescent; leaflets 7–9, rarely 5, deep green adaxially, ...abaxially glabrous or along midvein sparsely pubescent, or shortly prickly and glandular-pubescent, ....Flowers several in corymb, ... pedicel 1–2.5 cm, glandular-pubescent; bracts long ovate, margin glandular-pubescent. Hypanthium ovoid, abaxially glandular-pubescent. Sepals ... margin entire, sometimes 1- or 2-lobed, apex long acuminate. Petals 5, white or tinged with pink, obovate, base c...Styles connate into column, exserted, nearly equaling stamens, glabrous. Hip black-brown, ovoid, 8–10 mm in diam., shiny. Fl. Jun–Jul, fr. Sep. 2n = 14.
Korea, Russia (Far East)
Book  (1988)  Page(s) 159.  
 
location 150/5, R. maximowicziana Regel, SYNSTYLAE, Manchuria, Korea, Japan, before 1880, white, single, medium size, late-blooming, vigorous, branched, prostrate, 2-3 m, many bristles, few prickles, light green glossy foliage, 5-7 leaflets, orange to orange-red small matte-glossy rounded-ovoid fruit, sepals fall off very early
Book  (1971)  Page(s) 329.  Includes photo(s).
 
R.maximowicziana Rgl. in A. H. P. V, fasc. II (1878) 378; Crep. in Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg. XVIII (l879) 282; Boulenger in Bull. Jard. Bot. de Bruxelles IX (1933) 258. — R. luciae var. aculeatissima Crep in sched. ex Rgl. I.e.; cfr. Crep., 1. c. — R. coreana R. Keller in Bot. Jahrb. XLIV (1909) 46, non Kom.- R.kelleri Baker in Willmott, Gen. Rosa (1910) 75.— R.multiflora auct. plur., non Thunb.
Shrub, erect, dense, strongly branching; prickles few, small, curved, some in pairs, sometimes with admixture of erect or curved pricklets; leaves 5—10 cm long, 7—9 leaflets to 2—4.5 cm long, ovate or elliptic, orbicular or tapering at base, orbicular or acuminate at apex; teeth simple, shallow, 15—28 at each side, upper leaflets glabrous, pubescent only on lower side of midrib; petioles pubescent, sometimes slightly glandular, armed with small curved prickles; stipules narrow, glabrous, their margin shallowly ciliate-dentate (cilia shorter than breadth of stipules). Inflorescence corymbiform or oblong -paniculate; flowers 3.5— 5 cm in diameter, white; pedicels long, 2—3 cm, glabrous and smooth or slightly glandular; hypanthium globose or ovate, smooth; sepals smooth, with long apical appendage and 1—2 linear lateral feathers, dorsally glandulose, proximally recurved readily flowering; caducous; disk semi -globose or conical; hypanthium mouth narrow; style column glabrous, head orbicular or conical; petals globular, smooth, without sepals. June— July. (Plate XXVII, Figure l).
Forest edges, meadows, shrubs, banks of rivers and lakes.— Far East: Uss. Gen. distr.: Jap.-Ch. (Manchuria and Korea). Described from Posyet Bay and Victoria Bay. Type in Leningrad.
Book  (1918)  Includes photo(s).
 
Caulis saltem partim sarmentosus 2.
Caulis ascendens v. erectus. Columna styli glabra. Foliola membranacea. Flores diametro 2-3 cm. leviter suaveolentes.
R. multiflora, Thunb.
Caulis dense acicularis. Foliola vulgo elliptica v. oblonga utrinque acuta. Columna styli glabra.
R. Maximowicziana, Regel.
Caulis non acicularis sed sparsim aculeatus. Foliola rotundata v. late elliptica, obtusa v. acuta. Columna styli pubescens.
R. Luciae, Fr. et Rocheb.

1. Rosa Maximowicziana, Regel.
in Act. Hort. Petrop. V. (1878) p. 295 et 378. Nakai in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXX (1916). p. 234.
 
R. Luciae v. aculeatissima, Crep. in Herb. Petro. fide Regel.
R. multiflora, (non Thunb.) Kom. Fl. Mansh. II. p. 536. p.p.
R. Beggeriana v. tianshanica, (non Regel) Nakai Fl. Kor. I. (1909) p. 209.
R. Fauriei, Levi, in Fedde Rep. (1909) p. 199. pp. (Specimen ex Ouensan) Nakai Fl. Kor. II. (1911) p. 482.
R. spinosissima L. v. mandshurica, Yabe Enum. Pl. South Manch. (1912) p. 70.
R. coreana, (non Kom.) Keller in Engler Bot. Jahrb. XLIV (1910) p. 47.
R. granulosa, Keller l.c.
R. granulosa var. coreana, Nakai Veg. Isl. Quelp. p. 53 n. 734.
R. Jackii, Rehd. in Mitteil. Deut. Dendr. Gesells. (1910) p. 251. Nakai in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXX (1916) p. 236. Fedde Repert. XIII. (1914) p. 363.
Caules radicantes sarmentosi dense aciculati et aculeis binis sub foliis. Stipulse adnata? margine glanduloso-ciliatse. Folia 3-jugo imparipinnata. Axis foliorum aculeata. Foliola oblonga utrinque acuta v. apice acuminata, subtus pallidiora, margine serrulata. Inflorescentia in apice turionis et rami terminalis corymbosa bracteata. Pedicelli stipitato-glandulosi v. glabri. Calycis tubus ovatus, lobis lanceolatis caudatis appendiculatis v. inappendiculatis. Pet?la alba late obcordata. Flores suaveolentes.
 
Nom. Vern. Yong-ga-shi-ton-pul (Phyönsan bor.).
forma 1. leiocalyx, Nakai.
Calycis tubus glaber.
Hab. Ex Ham-gyong usque ad Kyong-san.
forma 2. adenocalyx, Nakai.
Hab. Phyöng-an : Pyeng-yang, Sensen et Wijyu.
Distr. Manshuria et Ussuri austr.
var. pilosa, Nakai.
 
R. Jackii var. pilosa, Nakai in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXX (1916) p. 236.
Petioli, pedicelli et cupula pubescentes. Stipulae, bractea? et calycis lobi extus toto facie eximie stipitato-glandulosa.
Hab. Kyong-geui: Suigen.
Planta endemica !
 
 
Article (magazine)  (1886)  Page(s) 192.  
 
This is the place to refer again to the Rose described by Mr. Regel as R. Maximowicziana. In my Primitiae, pages 528-530, I have spoken at length about this singular form that I was inclined to regard as a variety of R. multiflora. Today, with the knowledge that we have of the characters of Synstylae, this last opinion is no longer admissible: R. Maximowicziana cannot be a variety of R. multiflora; it is rather with R. Wichuraiana that one has to look for affinity. First and foremost, one should look for whether it is a legitimate species or whether it is not a hybrid product. I am not far from thinking that hybridization has not remained foreign to its production, but I reserve the right to discuss this question in a later work.
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com