|
|
'Cancan ™' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
I noticed that the parentage is rather vague for my rose Cancan™. So here is the details:
mother = 97-25.12 = (93-288.5 x 91-90.1)
93-288.5 = (88-33.3 x an unknown gold grandiflora)
88-33.3 = (84-179.4 x 85-39.1)
84-179.4 = (80-69.1 x Gold Badge)
85-39.1 = (79-71.5 x 80-11.7)
80-69.1 = (76-19.2 x Playboy)
76-19.2 = (Tampico x Applejack)
79-71.5 = (Dornroschen x 78-3A)
80-11.7 = (76-45.1 x 78-3A)
78-3A = (Faberge (F) x Eddie's Crimson)
76-45.1 = (Golden Jubilee x Applejack)
91-90.1 = (Knock Out x 80-38.1)
80-38.1 = 76-4C op (op=open pollinated)
76-4C = (R. rugosa 'Alba' x Applejack
Father: 99-238.1 = (97-33.15 x 95-898A.7)
97-33.15 = (95-1016.17 x 91-90.1)
95-1016.17 = (Morning Magic op)
91-90.1 = (Knock Out x 80-38.1)
80-38.1 = 76-4C op
95-898A.7 = (93-104.3 x Heritage)
93-104.3 = (85-139.1 x 84-196.8) this is a pink sister seedling of Double Knock Out that was blackspot susceptible but very fertile.
Let me know if you have any questions.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
30 MAY 17 by
 jedmar
|
Thank you, Will! we have added the missing seedlings. Please check if the parentage is now clear. Some questions:
- If 93-104.3 is a sister seedling of 'Double Knock Out', then 85-139.1 would be ('Carefree Beauty' x ((Tampico x Applejack) x Playboy) selfed, correct? Is this the same as 'Carefree Beauty' x 80-69.1?
- Similarly, 84-196.8 would then be 'Razzle Dazzle' x ('Deep Purple' x ('Fabergé' x 'Eddie's Crimson')). Is this the same as 'Razzle Dazzle' x ('Deep Purple' x 78-3A)?
If the above is correct, then we can also adapt the parentage of 'Knock Out' to show the appropriate seedlings.
|
REPLY
|
|
Everything is correct. Thank you for making these changes!!!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Available from - Brushwood Nursery
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This is one of the most blackspot resistant roses I grow here in Tennessee; also no powdery mildew. It repeats very well and is vigourous own root. This is my third summer with it, and its about 5x5 already, and very full.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
As to Cancan's parentage, Plant Patent 21,430 reads, "The new variety of Rosa hybrida shrub rose plant of the present invention was created at Greenfield, Wis., U.S.A., by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The cross was carried out during July 2001. The female parent (i.e., the seed parent) was the `Radcovery` variety (non-patented in the United States). The male parent (i.e., the pollen parent) of the new variety was the `Radcotee` variety (non-patented in the United States). The parentage of the new variety can be summarized as follows: `Radcovery`.times.`Radcotee`. "
|
REPLY
|
|
Thank you.
Smiles,
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
|
My pleasure. You all do a fantastic job here on HMF! Thank you for all of your efforts.
Rob
|
REPLY
|
|
Lyn is a long standing volunteer administrator and has for many years given freely of her time to help keep HMF current and accurate as well as continually providing suggestions for new features and helping identify problems and errors. The rose community owes Lyn much gratitude.
|
REPLY
|
|
Amen! Thank you, Lyn! Kim
|
REPLY
|
|
Yes, Kim, like you've not greatly contributed to HelpMeFind also. Your articles continue to be tagged as favorites; we should all be so lucky to write half as well as you do or have half you knowledge of roses.
|
REPLY
|
|
Thank you! As you do, we need a venue to share our passions. Help Me Find affords that marvelously. Thank YOU for creating it, maintaining it, improving and perfecting it and making it available to the world so generously and easily.
|
REPLY
|
|
Thank you everyone. It's a pleasure to work on HMF. One of the best parts is the participation of the rose community in helping us gather all of the information for the rose pages.
Smiles,
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
|
