PhotoComments & Questions 
Alice Aldrich  rose photo courtesy of Bierkreek
Discussion id : 69-314
most recent 9 JAN 13 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 7 JAN 13 by Jay-Jay
This rose ought to have bright clear-pink flowers. Here an off-white flower is shown.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 4 posted 9 JAN 13 by Bierkreek, kwekerij, de
the budwood came from Sangerhausen. I can't tell right now, if the cultivar at Sangerhausen maybe is not
correct or if there was made a mistake when cutting the budwood at Sangerhausen. Ihave only two photos of this one. I will check in future and if they are constantly white, we will remove this one.
Thanks, Jay-jay
REPLY
Reply #2 of 4 posted 9 JAN 13 by Jay-Jay
You're most welcome. It's still a nice rose.
I stumbled upon this photo, when I was digging in the booklet Rosa Rugosa of Suzanne Verrier.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 4 posted 9 JAN 13 by Bierkreek, kwekerij, de
Yes, I have the book too. But, still, no photo in that book, so no reference again. it stay's difficult, allthough I am quite sure you are right at this photo.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 4 posted 9 JAN 13 by Jay-Jay
Wat ik bedoelde was, dat toen ik de rozen uit dat boekje opzocht, ik deze roos op jullie/jouw foto op HMF tegenkwam...
En dat in de beschrijvingen en de referenties deze roos roze, of zelfs karmijn-roze genoemd werd.
Hoe mooi de roos op jouw foto ook is, ze is niet roze... Die discrepantie wilde ik benoemen, zonder te zeggen de foto klopt niet, want ik ken deze roos zelf niet.
REPLY
© 2017 HelpMeFind.com