|
Michael Garhart
-
-
These photos might be 'Lawrence of Arabia' AKA 'King Arthur' from a future decade.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 OCT 20 by
sam w
This rose regularly turns up in the springtime stacks of bodybag roses at the local stores. I bought one once and, to my surprise, it thrived in spite of its inauspicious beginnings. The next year I had the same experience and after a year off I bought a third one this way and it also prospers. All of which leads me to say that while 90% of the roses sold in those awful little plastic bags full of wet bark don't do very well, this instead is one of the handful that is actually worth the gamble.
|
REPLY
|
It helps to remove the garbage filler they put in those bags. Sometimes they will cause a fungal infection in the root zone. Such as dry rot.
Always inspect the roots and nip off any decay or where they are broken so those body bag roses have a fighting chance.
|
REPLY
|
If you want a good Red Masterpiece you can get a bareroot from Regan Nursery. I have one and it's thriving. Very underrated rose in that it is rated 6.9 in ARS Handbook. It's much better than that in my garden (Zone 5b, Chicago area). Hardy through two winters now.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Variety denomination: ‘MEICONFIZ’.
STATEMENT REGARDING PRIOR DISCLOSURES BY THE INVENTOR The first offer for sale of the new variety was Jun. 14, 2022, in the Netherlands. The first offer for sale of the new variety was by the inventor or another who obtained the new variety directly or indirectly from the inventor. No plants of the new variety have been sold in this country or anywhere in the world, nor has any disclosure of the new plant been made, more than one year prior the effective filing date of this application, and such sale or disclosure within one year was either derived directly or indirectly from the inventor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The new variety of rose plant of the present invention was created by controlled breeding at Le Cannet des Maures, Var, France by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., the seed parent) of the new variety was the ‘MEINEYTA’ variety (not patented). The male parent (i.e., the pollen parent) of the new variety was an unnamed seedling (not patented) that is the product of the cross between an unnamed seedling (not patented) and the ‘RADTKO’ variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,202).
The parentage of the new variety can be summarized as follows:
‘MEINEYTA’ X (Unnamed Seedling x ‘RADTKO’)
PP35648
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
7 days ago by
jedmar
Parentage added, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
Very nice. I think the seedling part is MIA.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
3 days ago by
jedmar
Corrected, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
I don’t get that much out of it, but my friend, who has a big rose collection, and where I took this photo, says it is her “best” if not strongest smelling rose. I tried to dig down as to what she meant by that, but noses are just so different.
|
REPLY
|
That's exactly why I ask. 'Allegorie' from the same breeder smelled good. 'Esprit de Paris' has yet to bloom for me to comment on. So far, I like the plants better than Austins.
|
REPLY
|
|