HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalCuttingsMember
Garden
 
Rockhill
most recent 10 AUG 19 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 4 JUL 17 by Rockhill
'Americaine' is Plate 87 in F. Komlosy's Rosen-Album, 1868-75. The accompanying text says it was of the Group Rosa moschata, originated in North America and was grown in France. It has been suggested that it might be 'Belle Americaine', Boll, 1857 - a pale pink Damask Perpetual. HMF References for 'Belle Americaine' mostly say it was a red Hybrid Perpetual, although an early one gives its identity as a pale pink version of Quatre Saisons, ie a Damask Perpetual. Seems as if there are two roses involved here. I have posted Komlosy's 'Americaine' in Photographs for 'Belle Americaine', so a comparison may be made.It has been scanned, and slightly cropped, from Bob Edberg's reproduction of ca 2010.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 3 posted 4 JUL 17 by scvirginia
The early references say pink or light red, which amounts to pink. I wonder if later references ran into some confusion with back-translating 'American Beauty'?

I don't see any HMF references saying pale pink or light pink. The reference from Otto was translated from the German, "zart rosa", which was translated here as tender pink, but could also be translated as soft or delicate pink... not necessarily pale. I've added a few other early references to this comments section; it seems that it was a delicate lilac pink with whitish petal reverses.

It's a lovely illustration, but I'd guess it's of another rose, and doesn't belong with this record...

Thanks,
Virginia

P.S. I see at least one instance of Belle Américaine being treated as American Beauty in the May 1887 issue of Journal des Roses, p.74:
Cependant il y a quelques années, on a encore en Amérique, comme j'ose le soutenir, trouvé bon et profitable de faire paraître sur la scène des roses comme Belle Américaine (American Beauty), une rose française d'une bonne réputation et d'une supériorité reconnue: Madame Ferdinand Jamain (Ledéchaux 1875)...

P.P.S. It occurs to me that some of the Prairie Roses raised by Feast and Pierce in America had 'Herbemont's Musk Cluster' as a parent.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 3 posted 9 AUG 19 by CybeRose
Boll (1837) called his little rose "Pretty American".
REPLY
Reply #3 of 3 posted 10 AUG 19 by scvirginia
There isn't anything here to indicate what happened to the illustration, but it was agreed that the Komlosy illustration probably was of Page's Noisette 'America', and it was moved to that record.

Virginia
REPLY
most recent 13 MAR 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 13 MAR 19 by HubertG
It's exquisitely beautiful.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 13 MAR 19 by Rockhill
It is, isn't it? it is one of my favourite roses.
REPLY
most recent 13 MAR 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 13 MAR 19 by Rockhill
Even though this is in black and white, it is a great photograph of Catherine Mermet and shows its characteristics well. Note the leaves with widely separated leaflets that have wavy edges, and which sometimes look buckled. The buds are held erect on a pedicel that gradually bends as the flowers mature. Love it.
REPLY
most recent 9 JAN 19 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 9 MAY 18 by HubertG
I have my doubts about whether the rose I grow as 'Papa Gontier' (from Ross Roses) really is the correct variety.
Mine never sets hips. Nabonnand (who bred this rose) used it as a seed parent for quite a few varieties, and as dedicated crosses too, not just as randomly gathered hips. Also, 'Lady Hillingdon' is supposed to have PapaG as its seed parent as well.
I remember reading quite an old reference in one of the rose annuals (1950's, 60's?) that it was a triploid, which is all good for my rose, but doesn't make a lot of sense if Nabonnands were actively pollinating it.

Also, the commonest characteristic in the early descriptions is its very long pointed bud. I can get longish buds in cooler months but no longer than other tea roses introduced at the time. During the warmer months the flowers actually come very small and are rather irregular in shape. The early descriptions of a very large flower just don't match. The few photos that exist don't really match either. It's hard to imagine the plant I grow being used as a florists' rose, even by late 19th century standards.

So I'm in two minds about whether this is correct. Does anyone else's 'Papa Gontier' set hips? Has anyone else had doubts about this rose before?

Another thing is that Papa Gontier's sport 'Rainbow' resembles the early descriptions (apart from the stripes of course) but doesn't resemble my rose, in flower form etc.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 14 posted 9 MAY 18 by Margaret Furness
The Tea book says "hip small, globular, yellow to orange". Its photo of the bud looks like yours.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 14 posted 9 MAY 18 by HubertG
Thanks Margaret. It also says "only an occasional small, yellow hip matures, containing one or two seeds.".
There are seven offspring listed here with Papa Gontier as the seed parent, five of which are Nabonnand roses. I guess the Nabonnands were just very persistent in making crosses.

I also felt the shape of the rose didn't quite match the early photos, and some descriptions such as the 6cm long bud and 5" open flower ones seemed discordant.
Also the 1880's Nabonnand catalogues describe the centre as shaded yellow, which I can only see on one Papa Gontier photo here, and an old illustration, but never on mine (but which also seems to occur on 'Rainbow').
REPLY
Reply #3 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by billy teabag
If yours isn't especially prickly, you may have something else.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by HubertG
Quite possibly, but mine does rather look like the other Australian Papa Gontiers here.

Does anyone who grows Papa Gontier get flowers up to 12-13cm across like the 'Journal des Roses' describes?
Or gets yellow in the base?
REPLY
Reply #5 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by billy teabag
Flower size is generally a bit 'how long is a piece of string'-ish with Teas. It depends on whether they are maiden plants, chopped back hard or lightly trimmed (or not trimmed at all); whether they open quickly in heat or slowly in cooler weather; whether grown under cover or the open air.
My 'Papa Gontier' has yellow petal nubs lightening to pale, creamy yellow in the eye zone.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by Rockhill
The Tea Rose book gives the size of 'Papa Gontier' flowers as 10-15 cms and when conditions are favourable my very big, long-established bush does have flowers that are up to 15 cms in width. The buds are long and pointed and open quickly, the irregular just-double flowers are deep carmine-pink to paler pink, variable in shape and the stems are prickly. All the other 'Papa Gontier's that I have seen in Australia are the same. There are plenty of stamens and carpals and it looks like a very fertile rose. The fact that it only sets an occasional hip is probably due to genetic complications resulting from its being triploid. As for its being a florists’s rose, I have found if picked before they begin to open on the bush and put into a vase, they last very well as cut flowers. On HMF there are a few pale pink flowers that do not look much like what we call 'Papa Gontier' here. Overall, I think that the rose I grow as ‘Papa Gontier’ very well matches the early French descriptions and the rose recognised as being 'Papa Gontier' by the Friends of Nabonnand Roses.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by Margaret Furness
I think the Papa Gontier at Renmark was imported many decades ago by Alex Ross, and passed on to David Ruston. From there it was likely to have been the major source of budwood in Australia.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by HubertG
Margaret, probably all the Papa Gontiers in Australia are from that same source (unless some old known specimen has been discovered here) but whether it is the correct variety or not was what I was questioning.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 14 posted 10 MAY 18 by HubertG
Rockhill, thanks, that's encouraging to know someone does get large flowers.
REPLY
Reply #10 of 14 posted 11 MAY 18 by Patricia Routley
I would go along with 15cm for 'Papa Gontier'. That pen in my Oct 16, 2010 photo (158840) measures 13.5c. My plant does not grow very well, possibly being set back in its youth by a small shrub which smothered it.

I haven't really done any homework on these roses, but I would look ar two roses and their sports: I wonder about the difference between 'Improved Rainbow' and 'Mme Driout' and it may be the height.

'Papa Gontier' 1882
'Rainbow' 1889 (broad stripes')
'Improved Rainbow' c1893 (fine stripes)

'Reine Marie Henriette' (a climber)
'Mme. Driout' 1901 (A climber)
REPLY
Reply #11 of 14 posted 11 MAY 18 by Rockhill
At one time, Patricia, my 'Papa Gontier' plant measured about 5 metres wide by 3 metres high but I had to cut it back before it took over that part of my garden. This is just part of what it looked like in its prime.
REPLY
Reply #12 of 14 posted 11 MAY 18 by Patricia Routley
How absolutely wonderful. Good gardener. Good conditions.
But I am thinking of the height of 'Papa Gontier's sport/s and I will respond further in 'Rainbow's file.
REPLY
Reply #13 of 14 posted 4 SEP 18 by HubertG
I'm beginning to wonder if the rose sold in Australia as 'Papa Gontier' could in fact be 'Rose d'Evian'.
'Rose d'Evian has the same contrasting colours on the inner and reverse of the petals, large blooms, long buds, dense bushy growth.
REPLY
Reply #14 of 14 posted 9 JAN 19 by HubertG
See 'Beauté Inconstante' comments for some recent opinions of mine concerning 'Papa Gontier', "Bermuda's Papa Gontier" and "Mrs Heggie's Red Tea".
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com