HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
most recent 7 OCT HIDE POSTS
Initial post 7 OCT by JDR-ID159686
Rose Listing Omission

Shrub, Sister Elisabeth

Publication Modern Roses 12, p. 485
growth compact, medium high (80 cm), flowers very full in small clusters, medium pink, moderate fragrance,breeder David Austin 2006,sedlingxsedling
Reply #1 of 1 posted 7 OCT by Patricia Routley
We have this rose listed. David Austin spells it with a Z: ‘Sister Elizabeth’, as does HelpMeFind.
most recent 1 JUN HIDE POSTS
Initial post 31 MAY by Just-one-more-rose
Hello - do you recall whether this photo was taken with a flash or not, and whether the colour appearing in the photograph is accurate? I'm curious because this photo appears more orange than the other photo's, and I am actually looking for an orange rose. Thank you
Reply #1 of 4 posted 1 JUN by JDR-ID159686

Here's the photo information. Is O.K.? Photo is not processed in Photoshop
Reply #2 of 4 posted 1 JUN by Just-one-more-rose
Hello - thank you - there is no problem with the photo.

What I mean is: when I take a photo with my phone, of some of my roses, the colour appears slightly different to my eye in real life, as compared to my photo. Not with all roses.

For example: my rose Parole is deep pink in reality, and it looks also deep pink when I take a photo. Same with my Blue moon rose.

But with my Fragrant Charm rose, it is deep red in reality (to my eye), but when I take a photo of it, it looks lighter/brighter, and the orange tone in the centre, and pink tone at the edges, are accentuated.

So that is what I mean - if you look at your Fragrant Cloud in reality with your eye, and you look at the photo, is it exactly the same colour (to your eye). I did not see this rose in reality yet, and I'm curious as to the real colour tone, especially since it looks different in different pictures.

Thank you very much for your help
Reply #3 of 4 posted 1 JUN by JDR-ID159686
I understood.
The color in the photo is real.
Reply #4 of 4 posted 1 JUN by Just-one-more-rose
Thank you :-)
PhotoDiscussion id : 111-113
most recent 30 MAY HIDE POSTS
Initial post 30 MAY by Aussie rose lover
I would like more research on the rose in this picture as it clearly isn't what it is said to be.This is because of the scalloped edges on the petals. Whether it is a possible sport of pearl drift or another variety misnamed who only knows! My feeling is that there is the likely hood fimbriata being in the lineage somewhere.
Reply #1 of 1 posted 30 MAY by JDR-ID159686
You are right. An error in the name. It's a Yves Piaget rose.
most recent 1 JAN 17 HIDE POSTS
Initial post 31 DEC 16 by JDR-ID159686
I have for this rose the different information:
See the photo in HMF
Reply #1 of 2 posted 31 DEC 16 by Maurice REYBAUD
La photo est correcte

ce sont 2 roses différentes

Prince Rainier III - MARpil - de Antonio Marchese - 1998
Orange-red - ( j'ai passé des photos )

Rainier III - de HENDRICKX - Rouge foncé -
( avant 1968 )
Reply #2 of 2 posted 1 JAN 17 by JDR-ID159686
Thanks for the information!
© 2018