|
|
-
-
|
This image is clearly showing Rosa "Spray Cecile Brunner", the admission of proliferation supports this proposition.
|
REPLY
|
|
No doubt about this 'BA' pict for me, because 'cl CB' is in my garden too. I never seen any rose proliferation on my 'CB'. 'BA' is dull whitish-pink and 'CB' showing a true medium pink here. "Clearly" 'BA' on this pict. Because this too frequent bad look of these roses here, 'AB' was removed from my garden.
|
REPLY
|
|
As ausregister said, this photo is that of 'Spray Cecile Brunner', the rose which was incorrectly known for decades, as 'Bloomfield Abundance'.
As the original 'Bloomfield Abundance' has now been discovered by Judy Dean, this file, as per the Note on the main page, is now reserved for the original 'Bloomfield Abundance' rose. Would you like to reassign your photo to 'Spray Cecile Brunner' or shall I do it?
I am sorry, I do not know what rose you are referring to when you abbreviate - AB.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This small but charming rose fade very-very quickly in full sun.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Thank you Jay-Jay ! :)
The autumn sunlight is very suitable to catch photos of 'AB'.
I have not yet seen on my young plant (2014) the purplish-pink color as we can see on many HMF pictures of this rose.
I wish you an excellent autumn reblooming on all your roses !
Jean-Claude
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Goed getroffen!
Well catched!
|
REPLY
|
|
Thanks Jay-Jay ! :)
Have good pleasure to see your 'ABells' this year too !
|
REPLY
|
|
