HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalMember
Garden
 
Jane Z
RoseArgosy
most recent 3 NOV SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 16 JAN 15 by Patricia Routley
I have a superb rose that came to me as an Alister Clark rose - 'Argosy'. But the original 'Argosy' was fuchsia pink or salmon flushed pink - and my rose is a purpling crimson with nothing salmon about it at all. I am very grateful to the man who put it on multiflora rootstock and sent it to me as it is truly beautiful. It came originally from Rustons. Photos are in the file.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 9 posted 16 JAN 15 by Jane Z
Patricia, your *Argosy* looks remarkably similar in several respects to "Florence Hinds" of Rookwood - leaflet shape & colour, bloom structure, bud shape & silver tones of sepals (at bud stage) etc etc ...
REPLY
Reply #2 of 9 posted 17 JAN 15 by Patricia Routley
Thank you Jane. I feel that my rose which came as 'Argosy' has much longer stems than "Florence Hinds". And I see more red tones in "florence Hinds" than my very deep pink, purpling rose. Now, if there was a red 'Dame Edith Helen'..........
REPLY
Reply #3 of 9 posted 17 JAN 15 by Jane Z
ah, Florence's weakness, her rather short stems ... otherwise just based on the images they have many similarities it seems
REPLY
Reply #4 of 9 posted 17 JAN 15 by Eric Timewell
This rose in the photos look very much like the so-called 'Mrs RC Bell' I was sold by Mistydowns last year (see photos for Mrs RC Bell). Very double, short stem, crimson turning blue, tea scent not strong but durable.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 9 posted 18 JAN 15 by Patricia Routley
The receptacle seems the same shape in both roses.
The pedicel of to so-called 'Mrs. R. C. Bell' is green, whereas "came as Argosy" is reddish.
I would say "came as Argosy" has long stems, whereas you say the so-called 'Mrs. R. C. Bell' has short stems.
I have added more photos of my rose. Would you mind having a look please.
I believe Cree and Bruce Treloar both know or grow the same rose as I grow.
It has absolutely no salmon colouring at all, so it is certainly not the original 'Argosy'. If we can't solve it, I might have to move my photos out into a file of its own.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 9 posted 18 JAN 15 by Eric Timewell
Photo of a leaflet of the pseudo-Mrs RC Bell supplied. Looks exactly like Patricia's pseudo-Argosy. The pedicel is exactly two inches long, whether that counts as short or long I don't know. It has not a skerrick of red on it. The present bloom is very double and very symmetrical, just under three inches across. "Purpling crimson" is a good description.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 9 posted 3 NOV by Patricia Routley
Eric’s 15 Mar 2014 photo of ‘Lubra’s puffy petals is reminding me very much of the rose which came to me as ‘Argosy’.
Due to the different colour of my rose and ‘Argosy’ my rose is certainly not ‘Argosy’. I feel that it may be ‘Lubra’ and intend to move my photos out of ‘Argosy’ and into ‘Lubra’. Any comment before I do?
(Interestingly both ‘Argosy’ (Clark) and ‘Lubra’ (Fitzhardinge) were both bred in 1938.)
REPLY
Reply #8 of 9 posted 3 NOV by HubertG
Patricia, I did grow 'Argosy' for a brief time several years back, but it never made it out of its pot and eventually died. I bought it from a Sydney grower (I can't remember the name right now) but he assured me that it was correct and from a "named specimen" although I never pressed him for details at the time. Some observations that I remember are; - that it was exactly like your photos from several years back which are the deep pink colour with buds and leaves identical to yours. I never saw mine approaching red. I remembered the allusion to 'Lorraine Lee' when I bought it but could see no obvious physical similarity to that rose. However one thing I observed was that it never set any hips despite having normal looking stigma and despite my persistent attempts at pollinating it, and I decided it might have been a triploid and possibly was a Tea x HT after all, or something similar. It's description as fuchsia in the early references puzzled me a little because it was not quite what I would have called fuchsia, but of course colours are objective especially over time.

So, at the time I grew it I did have some doubts as to whether it was correct, but in time I came to the conclusion that it probably was truly 'Argosy' mainly because it seemed to be such random a rose to be reintroduced without any good reason, and also because of its presumed odd ploidy matching something Clark might have experimented with.

Patricia, I guess what I'm saying is that the rose I grew as 'Argosy' appears to be exactly the same as yours, and that I wouldn't discount it as something else at this point. Does yours ever set hips?
REPLY
Reply #9 of 9 posted 3 NOV by Patricia Routley
I don’t think it does set hips as a rule. But there is one photo of a couple of hips photographed on 6 May 2018. I hope to remember to put a tag on the bush not to deadhead the current blooms. Coincidentally I planted ‘Lorraine Lee’ only a few metres from the rose in question and they are chalk and cheese.
Thank you for your thoughts HubertG. I will leave things as they are for the moment.
REPLY
most recent 5 JAN 21 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 25 FEB 15
* This post deleted by user *
Reply #1 of 12 posted 25 FEB 15 by Patricia Routley
So it might appear as if the rose found by Val and Graeme Johnston (see 1990 and 2002 refs) at Rookwood some time before [?] 1983 (when Trevor Nottle’s book 'Growing Old Fashioned Roses' was published). The Johnston’s gave it to Roy Rumsey (1990 ref) and later when Roy was unimpressed with it (Heather Rumsey did not include ‘Lady Edgeworth David’ in her 1990 book ‘Old Fashioned Roses for Australian Gardens’), they gave it as well to Peter Cox who sold it from his Thirlmere nursery in the late 1980s.

Peter Cox (2006 ref) says “I have been told by my informant that there is another plant of the Lady in Victoria” and I think he may be referring to John Nieuwesteeg’s clone. John (2003 ref) said “...I believe I have ‘Lady Edgeworth David’....”.

So, there may be two roses: A singly-borne rose which the Johnston’s found at Rookwood, NSW; and the cluster-flowered rose from John Niewesteeg, Victoria. Does anybody know where John got his rose from? (My plant came from Victoria and seems to be the cluster-flowered version.)

If there are any internet searchers out there who can really delve into old newspapers, it would be good to get an early reference to single or cluster flowering for ‘Lady Edgeworth-David’.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 12 posted 25 FEB 15 by Eric Timewell
Yes, that's one possibility among several.
Another is that LED produces single flowers when struggling and (very widely spaced) clusters when flourishing. A related problem is that all the roses shown on HMF are growing in what's left of Mediterranean climate in southern Australia. The ones we hear about were grown in a China type climate, now becoming outright monsoonal.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 12 posted 25 FEB 15 by Eric Timewell
Help! HMF has deleted my initial post. Can that be reversed? It read:

Peter Cox (89 in four weeks' time) writes:
"One nursery at Dural grew 'Warrawee' which I found to be a popular rose; and Roy Rumsey did for a time grow 'Lady Edgeworth David' and 'Warrawee'. (We also grew 'Warrawee' on our nursery at Thirlmeer 1979–94.) I did however acquire a plant of 'Lady Edgeworth David' from an HRIA member living on the NSW Central Coast that was given to him by Roy Rumsey with the comment 'You can have this plant. It is not worth growing commercially.'

"There is a photo of this rose on page 26 of [my] "Australian Roses". Whereas the colours match [the photos on Help Me Find], the form of the flower differs. The flower [photographed for "Australian Roses"] opens flat, cupped much like 'Souvenir de la Malmaison' and singly: yours are in clusters and [mine] could never be called floriferous or a vigorous rose. I never propagated this rose as it had little vigour."
REPLY
Reply #5 of 12 posted 25 FEB 15 by Patricia Routley
Not as a rule. I might have pressed DELETE instead of REPLY but wasn't conscious of doing so. However I took a copy of it and put it in a word doc so that I could formulate some sort of reply to you. Here is your initial comment

2015. Feb 25. Eric Timewell comment on HMF
Peter Cox (89 in four weeks' time) writes:
"One nursery at Dural grew 'Warrawee' which I found to be a popular rose; and Roy Rumsey did for a time grow 'Lady Edgeworth David' and 'Warrawee'. (We also grew 'Warrawee' on our nursery at Thirlmeer 1979–94.) I did however acquire a plant of 'Lady Edgeworth David' from an HRIA member living on the NSW Central Coast that was given to him by Roy Rumsey with the comment 'You can have this plant. It is not worth growing commercially.'

"There is a photo of this rose on page 26 of [my] "Australian Roses". Whereas the colours match [the photos on Help Me Find], the form of the flower differs. The flower [photographed for "Australian Roses"] opens flat, cupped much like 'Souvenir de la Malmaison' and singly: yours are in clusters and [mine] could never be called floriferous or a vigorous rose. I never propagated this rose as it had little vigour."

................... Far out! Your comment has just appeared magically again.
I am going to give this up and go out and buy a pair of knitting needles! Can't (under)stand this technology.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 12 posted 26 FEB 15 by Jane Z
unbelievably perhaps I can only find 1 reference to the rose in the mainstream media, from a national weekly womens magazine in 1942, (with 'malmaison' reference).

I did grow 2 plants, (miserable unhappy little specimens) of the JN LED & suspect they were the same as the Rookwood plant.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 12 posted 27 FEB 15 by Patricia Routley
Thanks Jane. Despite it not saying much, I've added that reference.
My plant is not all that happy either. But I have a perennial hope that maybe next year / season, I'll give them the right treatment and then all the roses will be wonderful.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 12 posted 27 FEB 15 by Eric Timewell
Dear friends, I know talk is cheap. But both Lubra and Lady Edgeworth David respond to drip watering in summer and heavy feeding in spring and autumn. They should be bushes five feet high with four-inch blooms at least. That Alister Clark thing about roses bred to survive in hot Australian summers is definitely not to the point. Of course buds will take a long time to form because there are so many petals.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 12 posted 27 FEB 15 by Margaret Furness
Difficult... Patricia's soil is rose-unfriendly, and we suspect the same applies to the bed at Renmark which houses the early Aus-breds - and is killing yet another plant of Midnight Sun. I hope there's one in Victoria.
REPLY
Reply #10 of 12 posted 27 FEB 15 by Eric Timewell
The Midnight Sun at Bacchus Marsh died of thirst a month ago. I pray that John Nieuwesteeg still has the original. I think it's a superb rose by any standard. I'd love to have an entrance hedge of it, if only I had the garden to go with it.
The Morwell soil is appalling. But since Lubra got regular watering and feeding there it's leapt to five feet.
REPLY
Reply #11 of 12 posted 29 MAR 15 by Eric Timewell
Today (29 March 2015) I saw 'Lady Edgeworth David' near Warragul (annual rainfall 40 inches) and again, roses from the same budwood at Bacchus Marsh (rainfall 20 inches). The Warragul rose is cupped and even, like the 2002 photo on the cover of the journal of Heritage Roses. The Bacchus Marsh plants are a wind- and sun-blasted mess. I think we are dealing with one rose responding to friendly versus hostile conditions, not two roses as it might have appeared.
REPLY
Reply #12 of 12 posted 4 JAN 21 by Patricia Routley
I think there were two roses initially. but Jane Zammit (Reply 6 of 9) grew them both and suspected they were the same.
No. 1.
I am reading old correspondence and have found a Aug 11, 2005 email from a friend as follows:
"Talked with Damien Nieuwesteeg today - he walked out to John a couple of times to check facts - seems that JN found his Lady Edgeworth David about 15-20 years [c1987?] ago at a neighbours property at Wandin and is 99% sure it is correct id.:"

No. 2.
Found at Rookwood c.1983 by Val and Graeme Johnston (possibly from the "Nellie Gain" grave. or the “Rosebud Maisie”/”Samuel Maisey” grave). Passed to Roy Rumsey and then to Peter Cox.
REPLY
Reply #13 of 12 posted 5 JAN 21 by Eric Timewell
Dear Patricia, just to be clear, both the roses I reported on came from John Nieuwesteeg.
REPLY
Reply #14 of 12 posted 5 JAN 21 by Patricia Routley
Thank you Eric. We love clarity.
REPLY
most recent 30 MAR 20 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 2 NOV 14 by Simon Voorwinde
This is a set of rose stamps released in 1999 by Norfolk Island. The last rose in the series shows a rose called 'David Buffet', who was the Chief Minister (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Buffett), three years after we left the island. Does anyone know anything about this rose? I can find no references to it anywhere.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 4 posted 3 NOV 14 by Jane Z
Wouldn't the Norfolk Island Philatelic Burea have a record of the photograph provenance (which should be a useful lead)?
REPLY
Reply #2 of 4 posted 3 NOV 14 by Simon Voorwinde
From my personal experience with them, I would not hold my breath that the NI Philatelic Bureau would have such records. I have still have friends living on the island who I have enlisted to help track down the story behind this rose.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 4 posted 3 NOV 14 by Jane Z
sadly their public online records only go back to 2000.

presumably Rotary Club members, as an example of 'local establishment' would remember the dates & at least some circumstances of the rose being named. presumably yours friends can contact DB direct can't they?

my long shot guess is that perhaps Swanes or similar nursery made available that particular naming right, purely for NI, which may explain why it is so difficult to trace in mainstream references ...
REPLY
Reply #4 of 4 posted 30 MAR 20 by Patricia Routley
Six years on.... Simon, I have opened a file for ‘David Buffett’ and moved your photo. Did you ever find any more information on this rose? If you did, can you answer in its file please.
REPLY
most recent 29 SEP 19 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 21 OCT 11 by Patricia Routley
It seems that many beautiful dark red climbing roses inherited from nanna or Auntie whatsis came with the passed down name of 'Black Boy'. 'Black Boy' was an easy name to remember and now it is difficult to know what the true 'Black Boy' was like. The three bushes that I have all open in the morning to a deep cupped bloom that the petals fold over and cover its private parts later in the day, or with rain - not quite sure which just yet.

I am struck by the glandular pedicel which rather abruptly becomes smooth one inch from the top, leading up to a very smooth receptacle. Do others see this trait in their 'Black Boy's?
REPLY
Reply #1 of 5 posted 11 MAY 15 by Give me caffeine
I know this is an old comment, but I think this habit of Auntie Whatsis and Co. calling every dark red climber 'Black Boy" in the '30's is relevant to my family history.

My mum, who is 80 and in firm possession of her marbles, has sometimes reminisced about the magnificent "Black Boy" that grew at her parents' house when she was a kid. After looking into Clark roses a bit I got curious, so asked her some questions about it.

Turns out that this "Black Boy" they loved so much never snagged her when she frequently brushed past it to get into the shed (so probably thornless, or almost) and had flowers that, while she wouldn't call them perfect exhibition form by today's standards, were still very nicely shaped rather than informal. They were fully double, never semi-double, and didn't go blue with age. She also remembered that it was never a profuse bloomer, but always had some. She couldn't remember what the foliage was like, since it was around 70 years ago and a young girl naturally focused on the flowers more.

Anyway, the characteristics she described don't fit 'Black Boy' but are a perfect match for another Clark classic: 'Countess of Stradbroke'. This would also fit with the construction date for the house, which was built within a couple of years of CoS being released. It was a very nice house (I remember it well, since my grandparents still owned it when I was young) and it would be natural for a moderately well off and houseproud owner to want Clark's latest and greatest when establishing a garden.

My grandparents bought the place in the late '30's, by which time the climber was well established. I had a strong suspicion that when they moved in they either assumed the rose was 'Black Boy', or were told so by a friend or neighbour who had heard of the ubiquitous BB but wasn't up to speed with some of Clark's other roses.

I emailed Mum links to the HMF pages for both roses, and her comment was that based on the information and pictures supplied she would say it was CoS. So, it looks like HMF has managed to fix a case of mistaken identity that has stood for 70 years. :)
REPLY
Reply #2 of 5 posted 12 MAY 15 by Jane Z
A 1937 plebiscite conducted by The Argus newspaper in Melbourne had Black Boy as a clear winner of the best climbing rose category with just over 850 votes. In 14th place was Countess of Stradbroke with a comparatively modest 75 votes. (I'm sure your hypothesis as to 'naming assumptions' is on the money)

(The best garden rose in the plebiscite was Lorraine Lee with 1819 votes)
REPLY
Reply #3 of 5 posted 12 MAY 15 by Give me caffeine
I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of those votes for Black Boy were actually made for a different rose the voter thought was Black Boy, and of course the vote could also be skewed simply because many more people would have heard of BB.

Apparently Clark himself thought his later 'Lady Mann' was superior to 'Lorraine Lee'.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 5 posted 12 MAY 15 by Jane Z
perhaps - however BB had been around nearly a decade longer and the basic sales figures for both roses meant that BB was by far the most planted - keep in mind though too, there were a great many newspaper gardening/rose columns & articles etc in that era, and many people would have known & followed names of favourites, new releases etc
REPLY
Reply #5 of 5 posted 29 SEP 19 by Patricia Routley
A visitor suggested to me that ‘Guinee’ is being grown in some gardens as ‘Black Boy’. I do recall one garden in Bridgetown, W.A. where this was more than likely the identity of one rose mistakenly labelled ‘Black Boy’.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com