|
|
David Elliott 
-
-
Initial post 22 APR by JJS
|
Dear David,
Perhaps those pictures should be moved to the entry "Crimson Glory, Cl."
I actually didn't realise that there was a climbing version until I saw your photographs! I own six plants of the non-climbing version, but now I'm going to buy the climber also.
Best,
Hans Struijk.
|
REPLY
|
|
Hans
Thanks, done. We need users like yourself to spot things like this.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
A new (the third for this rose) breeder's code name, DORfuri, is included in this photo.
|
REPLY
|
Reply #1 of 4 posted 10 NOV by jedmar
|
This is strange: Dorfuri is 'Roseraie de Blois', not 'Rina Hugo'.
|
REPLY
|
|
I only photographed the label not wrote it!! I suggest that the label is wrong as the desorption matches that in the combined rose list 2012.
|
REPLY
|
Reply #3 of 4 posted 10 NOV by jedmar
|
David, Ludwigs Roses also sells Rina Hugo as Dorfuri, so there is a general mixup somewhere in South Africa.
|
REPLY
|
|
Pretty similar colours in the mixup too. David, your helpful photo and our comments help others who see that label that something is amiss. Might even get Ludwig's Roses to alter their catalogue.
|
REPLY
|
-
PhotoDiscussion id : 68-098
-
|
Hi Becet
When photographing roses without a photograph-able name I photograph the reference number and we record the name for that number. In this case in the Durbanville rose garden in South Africa with solid beds of one rose variety each we wrote the number on the reference map we were given. I probably should either take these photos off HMF or explain.
We will be in Europe next June for the Baden-Baden rose trials and the Sangerhausen Heritage Rose Conference.
|
REPLY
|
Reply #2 of 3 posted 9 NOV by Lyn G
|
David...
I can see photographing the reference number for your files as you are taking the photos so that you upload your photos to the right rose page on HMF, but I really don't think those photos are a benefit to other site users and are really quite meaningless.
I really do appreciate your efforts to make sure you are maintaining accurate records for your photos.
Smiles,
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
Reply #6 of 3 posted 10 NOV by jedmar
|
Look forward to seeing you and Crenagh next year!
|
REPLY
|
-
PhotoDiscussion id : 68-077
-
|
This is the wrong rose, Marijke is pink!
|
REPLY
|
|
The rose plan given to the tour group labeled this bed as Marikie Koopman (note spelling!) Another example of how incorrect name arise. Thank you.
|
REPLY
|
|
