|
|
-
-
|
This rose ought to have bright clear-pink flowers. Here an off-white flower is shown.
|
REPLY
|
|
the budwood came from Sangerhausen. I can't tell right now, if the cultivar at Sangerhausen maybe is not
correct or if there was made a mistake when cutting the budwood at Sangerhausen. Ihave only two photos of this one. I will check in future and if they are constantly white, we will remove this one.
Thanks, Jay-jay
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
9 JAN 13 by
 Jay-Jay
|
You're most welcome. It's still a nice rose.
I stumbled upon this photo, when I was digging in the booklet Rosa Rugosa of Suzanne Verrier.
|
REPLY
|
|
Yes, I have the book too. But, still, no photo in that book, so no reference again. it stay's difficult, allthough I am quite sure you are right at this photo.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
9 JAN 13 by
Jay-Jay
|
Wat ik bedoelde was, dat toen ik de rozen uit dat boekje opzocht, ik deze roos op jullie/jouw foto op HMF tegenkwam...
En dat in de beschrijvingen en de referenties deze roos roze, of zelfs karmijn-roze genoemd werd.
Hoe mooi de roos op jouw foto ook is, ze is niet roze... Die discrepantie wilde ik benoemen, zonder te zeggen de foto klopt niet, want ik ken deze roos zelf niet.
|
REPLY
|
|
