|
-
-
Je pense qu’il s’agit de la photo de la variété ‘Rose de Rescht’.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
10 JUN 18 by
Unregistered Guest
Available from - Roses Unlimited
|
REPLY
|
Would you elaborate a little more please. I see they are listing it: Indigo (P) (m) <1845 Laura (C) (mp) 1848 Leda (D) ( w ) 1826
|
REPLY
|
You are right : I was wrong and I am sincerely sorry
|
REPLY
|
No problem at all Donald.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Les ressemblances avec là variétés ‘Saint-Priest de Breuze’ (Desprez - 1838) sont étonnantes ! Est-ce la même variété ?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
18 APR 20 by
jedmar
This is an interesting question, translated to English: The resemblances with the variety 'Saint-Priest de Breuze' (Desprez - 1838) are astonishing! Is it the same variety? The same question was posed also by Donald in this posted photo. What are the provenances of these two roses? Is the Desprez-Rose an "identification" from the last 50 years? Is the Rose in China a European rose which has come back under a Chinese name (there are several such cases)?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Je pense que cette variété présente de grandes ressemblances avec l’Hybride Remontant ‘Anna de Diesbach’ (1849).
|
REPLY
|
|