HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalCuttingsMember
Garden
Member
Listings
 
Jay-Jay
most recent 28 FEB HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 28 FEB by Jay-Jay
Looking as healthy as the climbing version in my garden.
REPLY
most recent 22 FEB HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 22 FEB by Jay-Jay
Nice to see this rose thrive in Italy too!
REPLY
most recent 25 JAN SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 20 MAR 15 by moriah
If you have one on it's own root, you only need one as the roots spread and shoots come up near by.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 11 posted 27 MAY 22 by peterdewolf
Great tip, thanks
REPLY
Reply #2 of 11 posted 9 JUN by Domenico 67
Wow that's good, as I love this cultivar, and just bought one on own roots!
REPLY
Reply #3 of 11 posted 10 JUN by Jay-Jay
It suckers a lot, maybe more than You would like it to do.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 11 posted 15 JUN by Domenico 67
Ok... I'll see if I love this rose enough ahahah

Anyway, this is another very Gallica-like trait. This plant is really like a strongly reblooming Gallica hybrid. Pretty unique in the entire rose world, I think.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 11 posted 4 JUL by Domenico 67
Update: my own roots Rose de Resht is doing unbelievably well, despite being still in a 6 l container. She's suckering and blooming like there's no tomorrow, developing in a thick mass of fragrant foliage and developing flower buds (she had already given a fair number of blooms before).
I'm keeping all my new roses well watered and fertilized, and I added some mycorrhizal supplement too.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 11 posted 24 JAN by odinthor
'Rose de Rescht' seems to have been confused in commerce with 'Rose du Roi'. I have had a very healthy own-root 'Rose de Rescht' for decades, and never once has it produced a sucker or runner. This was discussed in another (now-gone) forum of knowledgable old rose experts years ago, and the consensus was that there is a large contingent of supposed 'Rose de Rescht' out there which are actually 'Rose du Roi' specimens, as a large group of people had the "runner version," and an equally large group had the "never any runners version." Unfortunately, none of the posters had both, so a point by point comparison of them was never posted.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 11 posted 24 JAN by Jay-Jay
Which of the photographed or pictured Roses du Roi do You mean?
Almost none look like the picture Jonathan Windham posted.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 11 posted 24 JAN by odinthor
My point is in relation to comments on suckers or runners vis-a-vis 'Rose du Rescht' and 'Rose du Roi', not any of the HMF pictures of 'Rose du Roi'.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 11 posted 24 JAN by Jay-Jay
I'm not talking about pictures odinthor.
I'm referring to which of those roses de-pictured as Rose du Roi would You like to compare with those depictured as Rose de Rescht as for the habit of suckering?
What withholds You from comparing Yourselves? I would be interested in Your outcome.
REPLY
Reply #10 of 11 posted 25 JAN by Margaret Furness
I'm told that "Rose de Rescht" in commerce in Australia is now consistently what we think is Joasine Hanet. Which suckers.
REPLY
Reply #11 of 11 posted 25 JAN by Nastarana
'Joasine Hanet', AKA "Portland from Glendora" in the USA is a tall rosebush. Mine grows to about 5' and I think it gets even taller in warmer climates. I believe 'Rose de Resht' remains at around 3-4'.
REPLY
most recent 14 JAN HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 14 JAN by Jay-Jay
A wild guess: Peace in it's unknown background?
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 14 JAN by Lee H.
In the immediate post war period, I bet it would be hard to find a breeder who WASN’T experimenting with Peace.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com