HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalMember
Garden
Member
Listings
 
billy teabag
most recent 13 days ago SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 22 NOV by HMF Admin
Wishing a happy Thanksgiving to all our US members... and anyone else that wants a great excuse to feast for the day.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 13 days ago by billy teabag
And belated thankfulness for HMF and all who sail her.
REPLY
most recent 23 NOV SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 18 SEP 14 by Jane Z
Patricia, what is "Rookwood Cream" reference, I've not heard that before.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 18 posted 18 SEP 14 by Patricia Routley
Don't know. But Margaret may be able to help. She mentioned on May 1, 2010 that at Renmark in a listing of teas, there was "Bird Children". and "Rookwood Cream" which may be another "Bird Children" - being observed.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 18 posted 18 SEP 14 by Margaret Furness
Patricia has emailed me that conversation. Looks like "Rookwood Cream" was a cutting that BM sent, that grew for a while in the igloo, but didn't survive long enough to be planted out.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 18 posted 18 SEP 14 by Patricia Routley
Margaret, your photo of "Bird Children" with the three blooms is looking similar to my photo of "Mystery Cream Tea". Although Jane's close-up photos seem more imbricated than my "Mystery Cream Tea" does.

Nevertheless, I wonder if "Bird Children" could be 'Mlle. de Sombreuil' 1851? Its parent was possibly the pink 'Gigantesque' 1834 which may, in part, explain the pink sport/reversion "Bird Children Pink".

(ps - I really liked your study-name suggestion of "Jane's Pink Bird" for the pink sport which occurred in Jane's garden.)

pps - I have deleted the Note to "Rookwood Cream".
REPLY
Reply #4 of 18 posted 19 SEP 14 by Jane Z
unusual that BM would send wood out without the grave name as synonym. might it have meant to have been Rookwood McLean, mis spelt - clutching at straws here, but apart from "Stephi's Red", susbsequently changed to "Mary Ann Murray" around 2004/5 for memory, all study name roses were given earliest known grave or a location name, such as "Derek's Ofice Rose".
REPLY
Reply #5 of 18 posted 19 SEP 14 by Margaret Furness
Could well have been. The grower used to write the plant names on wooden icecream sticks, which are quite narrow, and reading them at times involved some guesswork. Barbara did send us McLean in that batch.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 18 posted 19 SEP 14 by Jane Z
ok, that's probably what happened, deciphering BM's handwriting on to an ice cream stick - LOL - & given you don't have McLean, (one of theOphelia tribe) it's a reasonable assumption - wouldn't pass a strict provenance due diligence test, but ... :)
REPLY
Reply #7 of 18 posted 20 NOV by HubertG
I made a comment under one of the photos of the pink "Bird Children" comparing it to a catalogue photo from 1910 of 'The Queen'. The habit and shape of flowers is strikingly similar. Also the foliage seems to be semi-glossy with slightly undulating edges. This can be seen even more clearly in other "Bird Children" photos as well.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 18 posted 20 NOV by Patricia Routley
The bloom of ‘The Queen’ looks a little more heavily (more?) petalled than “Bird Children”, but I do see the wavy edges in the leaves. The stance of the flowers in the half-standard illustration is also similar. I am sure those who are interested will take this on board HubertG. Many thanks.

Searching further. I do see similarities between “Bird Children” (which I don’t have) and “Mystery Cream Tea” (do have) and I wonder if they are the same. I note the same three suggestions have been put forward for both roses - ‘Mme. Melanie Willermoz’ 1845, ‘Mme. De Sombreuil’ 1851 and ‘Cornelia Cook’ 1855.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 18 posted 21 NOV by billy teabag
"Mystery Cream Tea" is definitely different.
We have also been wondering whether this pair are 'Souvenir d'Un Ami' and its white sport and have been trying to get the rose to us here in Western Australia so we can observe it closely over time.
Very frustrating as almost every attempt has met with misadventure.
REPLY
Reply #10 of 18 posted 21 NOV by HubertG
It would be wonderful if someone who grows either of the "Bird Children" roses could post a photo of the bloom at about the same stage of opening as in the 1906 Howard Hitchcock photo of 'The Queen' for comparison.
Also, regarding the leaves, there does seem to be a distinctive valley/fold/crease along the midvein of the leaves in the "Bird Children" and photos of "The Queen" giving it a shallowly V-shaped effect.
I did grow "Mystery Cream Tea" (as Susan Irvine's Cream Tea) quite a while ago, and just going from memory and looking at the photos of the "Bird Children" roses, my impression too is that they aren't the same rose.
REPLY
Reply #11 of 18 posted 22 NOV by billy teabag
The "Bird Children" roses - both pink and white forms, hang their heads so persistently, you could only get a photo like that by supporting it in that position.
I'll upload a few photos to show you what I mean and include a couple where I've lifted them up to show the face of the bloom.
REPLY
Reply #12 of 18 posted 22 NOV by HubertG
Thanks Billy, I certainly got my wish. There certainly is a distinct similarity with the 1906 photo of "The Queen". There is even a similar slight crimping effect on the petals.
REPLY
Reply #13 of 18 posted 22 NOV by billy teabag
Yes.
REPLY
Reply #14 of 18 posted 22 NOV by HubertG
How is the scent?
Interestingly, the Rosenlexican 1936 references give 'The Queen' a 5/10 and 'Souvenir d'un Ami' a 7/10.
REPLY
Reply #15 of 18 posted 22 NOV by billy teabag
Well it's always subjective and dependent on the conditions of the day, so lots of luck to anyone trying to corral that feature into a reliably repeatable format!
I have a tiny wee plant of the pink bird child and it has a single bloom that has that elusive sweetish, floralish, mysteriousish Tea rose scent. A hint of violet today, a hint of floral lifesavers if you're old enough to remember them.

The plant - it's posture and gesture and all its features - is so much like the picture from "Die Rose - ihre Anzucht und Pflege" Jedmar has uploaded.
REPLY
Reply #16 of 18 posted 22 NOV by HubertG
Thanks, at least it has a scent and it sounds nice! I do remember Lifesavers but not the floral ones.

Also compare the JaneZ 2008 photo of an open bloom of Pink BC (id 254978) to the 1912 photo of 'Souvenir d'un Ami' (id 156351). Again striking similarity there too. The bud in that photo looks rather egg-shaped and the edges seem to lift and scroll a little. Is this bud pattern typical of the "Bird Children"?
REPLY
Reply #17 of 18 posted 22 NOV by billy teabag
We have yet to have established plants here in the west to watch and learn from.

The photos on HMF provide a record of how they have looked when I have visited them at the HRIA Repository at Renmark and Margaret and Janes' photos show the same range.

Thanks to the kindness of friends in SA, we have been trying to get plants here for some years but have been frustrated at almost every turn. The fumigation required to pass quarantine combined with postal delays is hard on tiny roses and rose bits and we've not had success with budwood to date. I have one very small cutting grown plant that is being nurtured in the hope that there will be some propagating material next season.
REPLY
Reply #18 of 18 posted 23 NOV by HubertG
I just found another catalogue photo of 'The Queen' (id 325632) which gives a good view of an elongated receptacle. Compare to the "Bird Children" photo id 325602. They appear to be identical.

So far, everything is indicating that there is a exceptionally good possibility that the white "Bird Children" is 'The Queen'/'Souvenir de S.A. Prince'. at least in my mind.
REPLY
most recent 19 NOV HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 18 NOV by Margaret Furness
A couple of visiting rosarians from the US don't think "B L Sydney Linton" is Paul Neyron. Wrong colour, opens too flat. I note too that Paul Neyron has descendants as seed parent, but I haven't seen viable hips on my "B L S L".
REPLY
Reply #1 of 5 posted 18 NOV by billy teabag
Then they are in accord with Hillary who has always dismissed PN as an identity.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 5 posted 18 NOV by Patricia Routley
Has Hillary publicised her concerns? - I might have missed a reference.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 5 posted 19 NOV by billy teabag
No - you haven't missed a reference Patricia. Hillary doesn't have a plant of "B.L. Sydney Linton" and I'm referring to informal conversations we've had standing next to my plant.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 5 posted 19 NOV by Patricia Routley
Margaret – Seven seed descendants from 1869-2018. That is not a lot. I haven’t seen any hips at all (that I recall) on my HP’s. ‘Paul Neyron’ was mentioned as having a flat form in a 1936 reference.

Billy – thank you. My “Sydney Linton” died by 2015. I sent you up an own-root plant in Nov 5, 2004 and presumably this is the one you are now growing. My ‘Paul Neyron’ (currently quite sick) came from Zephyr Brook 1-5 and undoubtedly Hillary will know this rose well. In peak busy season here, I am most unwilling to relook at “Sydney Linton” as we discussed it ad infinitum in 2003-2006. It is probably not right that “Sydney Linton” and Paul Neyron’ are in the same file, but it would take a lot of untangling to separate them.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 5 posted 19 NOV by billy teabag
Yes - you are right - The "B.L. Sydney Linton" growing here is the one you sent up (is it that long ago?)
HPs are not really happy here. I think they are more comfortable in places where they get at least a bit of frost in the winter and not so much heat in the summer, so it has always looked a bit tenuous. A very modest plant and the amount of spent wood equalling the amount of new wood each year. But when it blooms in a mild spring, it is a most lovely thing and I will always remember David Ruston's magnificent and deceptively simple arrangement of it in its home town at the Hay Conference in 2003.
'Dr Hogg' is the only other HP that has survived here. Even' Frau Karl Druschki' lost the will to keep trying last year.
REPLY
most recent 19 NOV HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 18 NOV by Margaret Furness
I wonder about the receptacles in this illustration.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 5 posted 19 NOV by HubertG
You mean they look a bit too rounded compared to a real bloom?
REPLY
Reply #2 of 5 posted 19 NOV by billy teabag
The 'flared cup' is well represented in our photos here but every receptacle isn't necessarily like this.
Any statement about Tea roses needs to be qualified with 'often' or even the bolder 'usually'.
One thing we can be certain of is that Tea roses will deviate from any norm we try to impose on them.
I just went over to check the blooms on our plant on this cooler day and apart from the flared cup receptacles, there is a range of sizes and variations of cup-shaped receptacles.
If you have plants blooming at the moment, will you check yours?
REPLY
Reply #4 of 5 posted 19 NOV by HubertG
I don't think that artists always paid too much attention to the receptacle shape.
I don't grow this rose though I have wanted to. It's always the descriptions that the flowers mark so easily that puts me off.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 5 posted 19 NOV by Margaret Furness
Too small, and possibly constricted at the top in the illustration.
I see what you mean, Billy; below is a sample of the many on my bush at present, with photo-bombing ant. Most are like the one on the left. The one on the far right looks a bit constricted.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 5 posted 19 NOV by billy teabag
Snap! here.
REPLY
© 2018 HelpMeFind.com