HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Search PostsPosts By CategoryRecent Posts 
Questions, Answers and Comments by Category
Discussion id : 117-361
most recent 4 JUL 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 29 JUN 19
* This post deleted by user *
Reply #1 of 14 posted 30 JUN 19 by Ozoldroser
Does your rose have a lighter reverse to the petals as the picture of Charles Wagner has darker reverses? Have you access to any old nursery catalogues from your region as that might be a help to know which roses came to Uruguay?
REPLY
Reply #2 of 14 posted 30 JUN 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
I don´t have one. The reverse is light, but in the picture isn´t possible to see it. Do you know it?
REPLY
Reply #3 of 14 posted 1 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
There were so many HPs released. Have a look at Reynolds Hole (Trouillard 1861).
REPLY
Reply #4 of 14 posted 1 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
In internet, I found this Reynolds Hole, it´s diferent.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 14 posted 2 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
Good luck with finding the name for your rose!
Margaret
REPLY
Reply #6 of 14 posted 2 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
Margaret there are 2 Raynold Hole, Do you know the both?
REPLY
Reply #7 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by HubertG
Your last photo looks more like 'Mrs. Reynolds Hole'.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
The one bred by Trouillard might be the rose sold in Australia and elsewhere by mistake as Mrs Reynolds Hole (Rockhill has written an article about this recently). No roses named just Reynolds Hole are sold in Australia (my country) now.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
I found two roses in HMF, what do you think about them? First: Reynolds Hole - Trouillard 1861, second: Reynolds Hole - Paul 1872
REPLY
Reply #10 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
Margaret, do you speak about RH Trouillard 1861?
REPLY
Reply #11 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
Yes, the RH Trouillard 1861 is the one that looks like the rose sold in error now as Mrs Reynolds Hole. Rockhill said that it could be another similar Bourbon or HP - there were so many released - but it isn't the true Mrs Reynolds Hole, which should be a Tea.
REPLY
Reply #12 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
Do you know it?
REPLY
Reply #13 of 14 posted 3 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
I grow the rose sold as Mrs Reynolds Hole - it looks like the picture of RH Trouillard 1861, and grows like a Bourbon. It smells too good for a Tea. Photos below in my garden.
The article is on pages 30-33 of https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-1342545091/view
REPLY
Reply #14 of 14 posted 4 JUL 19 by Jose Luis Marginet Campos
Dear Margaret, thanks for the bibliography sent. The rose that you cultivate would be Mrs Reynolds Hole? The shape of the flower is a little different from that of the drawing: in one case it is herged and in the other it is not. On the other hand, in the drawing it would seem that the inner petals do not open.
Is it possible that Reynols Hole and Mrs Reynolds Hole are different roses?
The article says that "it is very similar to Catherine Guillot B", and it looks like her rose. Do you think your rose could be Catherine Guillot?
The shape of the plant is very similar, and the flowers are not vertical. I add photos of Catherine Guillot
REPLY
Reply #15 of 14 posted 4 JUL 19 by Margaret Furness
The rose that I grow is sold as Mrs Reynolds Hole, but it is not correct: it is not a Tea.
I don't know enough about HPs and Bourbons to guess at what its true name is - as I said, there were so many! I think that Catherine Guillot is darker than my rose, in your photos.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com