|
'67-305' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
1 DEC 19 by
Tearose
Does anyone know if a plant of this rose still exists?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 4 posted
1 DEC 19 by
jedmar
Is it lost in the San Jose Heritage Rose Garden? According to the references and photos it was also planted in the Huntingdon Botanical Gardens. You might check with them.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
13 DEC 19 by
Kim Rupert
It existed in the Rose Study Plot, where the new Chinese Pavilion now sits. I seriously doubt it is there anywhere now.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
14 DEC 19 by
Philip_ATX
I've been on the quest for this hybrid for some time, and as best I can tell, it is extinct as of the last year or two. The San Jose accession appears to have been the last extant plant. A very disappointing loss.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
14 DEC 19 by
Kim Rupert
I have just emailed Tom Carruth, Curator of Roses at The Huntington, to inquire if he knows of its existence elsewhere on their grounds.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
29 MAR 17 by
Philip_ATX
As I understand the linked article from the American Rose Annual, 1987 "A PROBABLE AMPHIDIPLOID OF ROSA ABYSSINICA AND ROSA RUGOSA" written by Dr. Basye, the parentage should more properly read *seedling* of the diploid cross, (R. moschata abysinnica x R. rugosa rubra). It is a presumed self, and presumed amphidiploid, but Basye acknowledges possibility of it being a tri-species hybrid as he had tetraploid species in his garden which might have paired with an unreduced female gamete to produce this tetraploid. Thanks.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
2 NOV 16 by
Jonathan Windham
Read more about this rose here:
A Probable Amphidiploid of Rosa abyssinica and Rosa rugosa http://bulbnrose.x10.mx/Roses/breeding/basye/Amphidiploid/Amphidiploid.html
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
2 NOV 16 by
Patricia Routley
thank you Jonathon. We've added that website as a reference for the rose.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
28 APR 06 by
Enrique Munoz Ramirez
This rose, much like R. kordesii, is actually a seedling from R. moschata abysinnica x R. rugosa rubra. He wrote in his ARS article that he doesn't know that this is a true amphidiploid, but he believes that it might be.
|
REPLY
|
|