'Décoration de Geschwindt' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
25 JUN 23 by
odinthor
The text in your quote from the Journal des Roses of 1896 page 56 has a mistranscription. The true text reads "mis au commerce en 1886", not 1880.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
25 JUN 23 by
jedmar
Thank you, corrected!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
19 MAY 08 by
Margaret Furness
I have a foundling which may be this rose (although it isn't on the early Australian catalogues known to us). It's planted in heavy clay dosed with gypsum, and is suckering mildly. I suppose that could be the rugosa ancestry. Does Geschwind's Orden sucker?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
13 APR 19 by
Patricia Routley
Apparently it does.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
26 FEB 18 by
Michael Garhart
I always fall in love with the photos of many Geschwind roses, like this one. But then I read how big they get... :[
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
13 APR 17 by
Margaret Furness
Our foundling (I don't know whether it's Geschwind's Orden or Gem of the Prairies) has a very short flowering season.
|
REPLY
|
|