HELPMEFIND PLANTS COMMERCIAL NON-COMMERCIAL RESOURCES EVENTS PEOPLE RATINGS
|
|
'Morning Mist' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
15 MAR 10 by
Don H
The July 8, 1956 edition of The Saint Petersburg Times reported that the parentage of Sterling Silver was "a cross between the well known hybrid tea rose, Peace, and a grey blue-lavender rose called Morning Mist".
news.google.com/newspapers?nid=888&dat=19560708&id=n9ANAAAAIBAJ&sjid=M3YDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5601,3780064
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 7 posted
15 MAR 10 by
jedmar
Reply
#2 of 7 posted
15 MAR 10 by
Don H
Thanks. Maybe you could add it to the lineage for Sterling Silver?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 7 posted
16 MAR 10 by
jedmar
Reply
#4 of 7 posted
17 JAN 12 by
Kim Rupert
The patent for Sterling Silver states ""The male parent was the variety Peace and an unnamed seedling as the female parent - the latter coming from a strain similar to Morning Mist." Therefore, the seed parent is NOT Morning Mist, but a related seedling." So, while Peace was involved, the other parent was, per the breeder's official claim, a possibly related seedling to Morning Mist, instead of Morning Mist itself.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 7 posted
17 JAN 12 by
Landperson
Kim, are you gonna fix it on the Sterling Silver rose page or do you want me to?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 7 posted
17 JAN 12 by
Don H
Gladys FIsher's patent for Morning Mist says it was "a self pollinated seedling from one of my own unnamed seedlings" adding to murkiness.
Others have expressed doubts about the male parentage of Sterling Silver as well, pointing out to Peace as being a convenient sire for marketing purposes.
Perhaps the answers lay in the Conard Pyle archives at the University of Delaware. Those were the days of paper correspondence so there is a good chance of finding letters from Gladys.
www.lib.udel.edu/ud/spec/findaids/conard.htm
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#7 of 7 posted
20 APR 20 by
Michael Garhart
My personal opinion is that it is a seedling of Peace.
https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.122337
You can see Peace-like new growth in that photo, but also S.Silver has broader petals and decent form, which was rather difficult to get from most lineages at that time without using Peace. Also, Peace provides color disambiguation that silvery mauve often requires to be present.
The other half is obviously the mystery meat. I think its from an early pelargonidin types for several reasons. First, its a shorter rose than most HT. This happened in many early HT (Ophelia types, for example), but not as commonly during the 50s. Although this can be partially blamed on weak vigor due to selection bias of a rare color, it seems unlikely in this case, because the internode relativity seems to contradict such an idea. So it was probably both short and weak, rather than simply weak. I believed a dwarf variety is the culprit, such as those found in many early floribundas carrying pelargonidin. Second, the timing is perfect for the when such unusual silvery mauve colors were truly possible from these early pelargonidin types. Orangeade, as an example, has an extensive history with silvery mauves. 'Lavender Delight' is a prime example. Orange Sweetheart, for example, was introduced during the timeline when Morning Mist (a possible relation or sister) was being conceived. Last, to me it looks like the parentage of Morning Mist was deliberately concealed to hide the rose responsible for the color shift, only offering the idea that it was bred from roses that could typically make a florist rose at the time. Yet, the petal count and flower size is more like that of an early flori or flori hybrid.
If I had to guess, I would guess 'Fashion' was involved. I would guess a red florist rose derived from the roses she had listed and Fashion, and that the result was an odd-toned darker mauve.
I would also hazard a guess that 'Morning Mist' is a self of this unknown seedling, and that when she realized the outdoor vigor was even worse than the florist rose it was bred from, she crossed it with 'Peace' and got a silvery, better formed rendition.
Well, anyway, thats my best guess with how much little information is available.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 7 posted
20 APR 20 by
Kim Rupert
Thanks, Michael. That is a very interesting and plausible supposition.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
24 JAN 13 by
Don H
Encyclopedia of Rose Science edited by Thomas Debener, Serge Gudin
books.google.com/books?id=yizJK-4wJYsC&pg=PT3124&lpg=PT3124&dq=%22morning+mist%22++fisher+rose&source=bl&ots=BTUxo_e0za&sig=SeylMjpKCGiE7oETmyVKIXhjnd4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_rkAUY-WBMHL0AHc1YC4BQ&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAg
Morning Mist - HT, m, 1950; flowers lavender tinted gray, semi-dbl,=., 15-20 petals, 3.5 in., exhibition form, moderate fragrance; moderately vigorous, upright growth; Fisher,G.; Arnold-Fisher Co
|
REPLY
|
|
|