|
|
'Sir Paul Smith' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
15 OCT 20 by
Andrew from Dolton
|
In a client's garden just having a third flush of flowers, 15/10/20.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
20 OCT 20 by
 Magnus95
|
Beautiful colour and nodding heads! I don't suppose you could comment on the fragrance? Thanks
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
20 OCT 20 by
Andrew from Dolton
|
It has a fresh tea fragrance not a rich damask scent.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
18 OCT 20 by
Jay-Jay
|
A strange description of the flower. Is there a contradiction?
Apricot or apricot blend Large-Flowered Climber.
Versus:
Climber, Large-Flowered Climber.
Deep pink to carmine-pink.
Take a look to at: Discussion id : 35-060
most recent 25 MAR 09
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
18 OCT 20 by
Andrew from Dolton
|
It is slightly paler on the reverse of the petals but even in the summer when it was quite hot the flowers never showed any apricot colour at all.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
19 OCT 20 by
jedmar
|
The same question wasraised in a 2009 comment. Apricot blend must be an error in Modern Roses.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
19 OCT 20 by
Jay-Jay
|
Maybe change the description on HMF?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
19 OCT 20 by
jedmar
|
Jay-Jay, the info on line ARS is what the American Rose Society publishes. They have to change it, then we can follow. Our description of colour is correct.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
19 OCT 20 by
Jay-Jay
-
-
Initial post
24 MAR 09 by
The Old Rosarian
|
Sir Paul Smith, the climber bred by Beales in 2006, is a carmine pink not apricot.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
25 MAR 09 by
Cass
|
It sure is. Must be a mistake from the registration form that was used for Modern Roses. Thanks.
|
REPLY
|
|
