|
'Stars 'n' Stripes' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
7 NOV 17 by
RoseAnne
Regarding rosa 'Stars 'N' Stripes', bred by Ralph Moore
According to HelpMeFind United States - Patent No: PP 4,029 on 1 Apr 1976
but if you view USPTO Patent information, the patent date is 29 March 1977.
1 Apr 1976 is the patent application filing date.
I am not an expert on these issues - please let me know if I am incorrect in my observation.
Thank you.
Judy Lee
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
7 NOV 17 by
Patricia Routley
You are quite correct. Thank you Judy Lee - we have corrected the dates.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 JUN 15 by
styrax
The description states that this rose is heavily mossed, which it most definitely isn't!!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 4 posted
4 JUN 15 by
Patricia Routley
Thanks Salix. There is no mention of moss either in the Patent or the refs. We've deleted that misleading sentence and we thank you for your correction.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
4 JUN 15 by
styrax
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
4 JUN 15 by
styrax
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
4 JUN 15 by
styrax
The original post was The description states that this rose is heavily mossed, which it most definitely isn't!!
For some reason, instead of deleting the duplicate post, it deleted the original. This has happened before. I think it is a bug.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 4 posted
4 JUN 15 by
Margaret Furness
I had that happen a few days ago, too.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 JUL 09 by
sister midnight
This is a really beautiful miniature rose. Without pruning it grew way over 36 inches, which I've read isn't rare, but it should be cut back because growing that tall reduces bloom. I found it always laden with red and white striped flowers. I never had a problem with it, not even black spot, until I moved it from a full sun (8 hours) to a partial sun (5 hours) location, I then got one good flush and then it just died. My fault, I wish I'd left well enough alone.
|
REPLY
|
|