|
|
'Boulotte' rose Reviews & Comments
HelpMeFind's future is in your hands - Please do not take this unique resource for granted.
Your support of HelpMeFind is urgently needed. HelpMeFind, like all websites, needs funding to survive. We have set a premium-membership yearly subscription amount as low as possible to make user-community funding viable.
We are grateful to the many members who have signed up so far, but the number of premium-membership members remains too small for us to sustain the current support and development level. If you value HelpMeFind and want to see it continue we need your support too.
Yearly membership is only $2.00 per month and adds a host of additional features, and numerous planned enhancements, to take full advantage of the power and convenience of HelpMeFind. Click here to start your premium membership..
We of course also welcome donations of any amount. Click here to make a donation. Donations of $24 or more receive a thank-you gift of a 1-year premium membership.
As far as we have come, we feel HelpMeFind is still in its infancy. With your support we have so much more to accomplish.
-
-
Initial post
11 JAN 21 by
Daniel from Normandy
|
Bonjour,
Calvert est crédité de 2 roses reliées à Wellington, une Cenfeuilles et une Chinensis.
La description (avec une planche en couleur) donnée dans le Florist's Guide par Sweet ne nomme pas l'obtenteur ni la date de création de la rose (la date 1831 indiquée sur la planche est celle de cette planche pas celle de la rose de 1831 de la Cenfeuilles de Calvert), mais précise que la rose décrite est issue de indica x damascena. Ce n'est donc pas une Cenfeuilles, ni une chinensis, mai un Hybride de Chine. Comment peut-on alors affirmer qu'elle est de Calvert ?
Cordialement,
Daniel
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
7 MAY 21 by
CybeRose
|
Thank you, Daniel. This matter does need more investigation.
"Lee's Wellington, purplish, double and globular", may be a better guess.
(Listed by Macintosh ,1838)
Best wishes, Karl
"Calvert is credited with 2 roses related to Wellington, a Centifolia and a Chinensis.
The description (with a colored plate) given in the Florist's Guide by Sweet does not name the breeder or the date of creation of the rose (the date 1831 indicated on the plate is that of this plate not that of the rose of 1831 of the Centifolia of Calvert), but specifies that the rose described is from indica x damascena. It is therefore not a Centifolia, nor a Chinensis, but a Chinese Hybrid. How then can we say that it is from Calvert?"
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
24 JUL 16 by
CybeRose
|
L'horticulture francais p. 573 (1825)
... la Rose Boulotte (gain, Cartier), fleurs plus que moyennes très-doubles, en sphère ou boule cramoisi vif foncé, lorsque les divisions du calice sont séparées, et s'épanouissant avec les formes d'une superbe et large anémone carmin foncé et zonée brun; très-riche plante.
|
REPLY
|
|
