|
|
'Aglaïa' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
23 FEB 21 by
Nadene
|
Hi, Is any one able to help with comments on this rose. I am not completely convinced that it is Aglaia. All map references for this garden have it listed as Aglaia. It has always been vigorous and has to regularly be pruned off the grass from its rambling habit. I think it has been white from the bud and not faded but my memories of it could be wrong.
Photos: February 1, 2021 (Summer)/ Site no. SG 59 C05
Rex Hazlewood Garden, Old Parliament House Gardens, Canberra, Australia.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 6 posted
23 FEB 21 by
 Margaret Furness
|
What I grow as Aglaia is a found rose: it's definitely yellower than your photos in its early stages. But thornless it definitely isn't. So I'm not sure what I have. But Jedmar's photo shows the vicious prickles.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 6 posted
23 FEB 21 by
Patricia Routley
|
Nadene, read the comments for ‘Sander’s White Rambler’. Your rose may be the one I saw in a rambler clump at Melville’s Nursery, W.A., and as well in the south island of New Zealand.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 6 posted
23 FEB 21 by
Margaret Furness
|
Nadene, if you want the yellow rambler, I can start a cutting for you.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 6 posted
11 MAY 21 by
Patricia Routley
|
Nadene,how did you get on with this rose? I note the Rex Hazlewood garden is listing ‘Aglaia’.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 6 posted
11 MAY 21 by
Nadene
|
Hi Patricia, I haven't made much progress with this rose. I have had to put it on hold while finishing the other Gardens to meet timeframes. I aim to put more work into this garden very soon. Its a pretty little rose and look forward to chasing it up again. Thanks, Nadene
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 6 posted
11 MAY 21 by
Patricia Routley
|
I am quite sure it is not ‘Aglaia’ and therefore I have made a new file for it called “Hazlewood SG 59 C05”. if you lose track of these unknown roses, just look up the appropriate garden’s list of roses
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
12 MAY 10 by
Margaret Furness
|
Peter Beales states in his "Classic Roses" that the stems of Aglaia are almost thornless (page 263 in the 1997 edition). If so, our foundling (which is also sold incorrectly in Australia as Thisbe) isn't that.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
12 MAY 10 by
Patricia Routley
|
I still think our foundling is 'Aglaia' Margaret. I have downloaded the 1975 reference which says "ripping thorns" and The Old Rose Adventurer page 356 quotes an 1896 reference which says "a small number of short thorns"
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
12 MAY 10 by
Margaret Furness
|
Ripping thorns is right!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
4 JAN 09 by
ALBERT
|
Available from - Vintage Gardens
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
4 JAN 09 by
HMF Admin
-
-
Initial post
20 OCT 08 by
Margaret Furness
|
Could someone who grows this rose confirm that it "blooms in flushes throughout the season"? We have a spring-blooming foundling which appears similar (and is not Goldfinch because it has vicious prickles).
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
21 OCT 08 by
Cass
|
Yes, you're right to question whether this rose repeats. According to Vintage Gardens, it does not.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 1 posted
12 MAY 10 by
Patricia Routley
|
How do I find what rose you are talking about please?
|
REPLY
|
|
