'Coco Flamingo' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
4 MAY 18 by
Anthony Wallis
|
Disease resistance was determined without using antifungal sprays even though this cultivar is suscpectable to BlackSpot it does recover quick and has multiple flushes through the season I am sure in a less humid enviroment it would be be almost BS free
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 APR 18 by
Anthony Wallis
|
Hi I would like to bring to your attention a mistake in the description of my rose Coco Flamingo you have it listed as thornless it is moderately well armed with prickles on both the canes and leaves and it's fragrance is simillar in scent and strength to its pollen parent Scentimental
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
21 APR 18 by
 Patricia Routley
|
Thanks Anthony. Fixed now. I guess the Registrar made a mistake in these details as it is registered as being thornless and having no fragrance.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
21 APR 18 by
Warren Millington
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
22 APR 18 by
Patricia Routley
|
Thanks Warren. Perhaps Anthony might contact Modern Roses to correct their details on his rose. It only takes a line or two in an email.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
22 APR 18 by
Warren Millington
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
22 APR 18 by
Patricia Routley
|
Great. Thanks to you both.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
22 APR 18 by
Anthony Wallis
|
Yes it was an error I have been in touch with the Australian rose registrar and he will be getting it ammended it would seem it was a simple data entry error when it was being transcribed from the forms. Also the cultivar name has been changed it will now be AWWcoco and the the exhibition name remains Coco Flamingo thankyou for promptly fixing this for me
|
REPLY
|
| 
