'Gruss an Freundorf' comments & questions

	Photo		Comments & Questions

Gruss an Freundorf rose photo courtesy of member cyra

My HMF:

Discussion id : 115-128 most recent 31 JAN 19 SHOW ALL

Initial post 27 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

Both Cyra and Kate have posted photos taken at Sangerhausen of a rose which has either been mislabeled or has been taken over by a rootstock and is not 'Perle vom Wienerwald'. Their photos fit no description in the rose literature of 'Perle vom Wienerwald'.	REPLY

Reply #1 of 5 posted 28 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

Mislabelled I’d say. Confusingly, they might fit the other rose in the old 1914 photo ‘Gruss an Freundorf’ which seems to have seven leaflets.	REPLY

Reply #2 of 5 posted 29 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

Yes, mislabelled. As you say, the rose shown in the photo is 'Gruss an Freundorf'. Not sure but I'd hope the two roses at Sangerhausen have been correctly labelled in the meantime.	REPLY

Reply #3 of 5 posted 29 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

I hope so too. I’ve moved the photos.	REPLY

Reply #4 of 5 posted 30 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

I have informed Sangerhausen. They will look into it.	REPLY

Reply #5 of 5 posted 31 JAN 19 by HMF supporting member

The mislabeled 'Perle vom Wienerwald' at Sangerhausen was replaced with the correct Rose in 2017.	REPLY