One or more site guests believe this photo is incorrectly labeled or inaccurate !
-
-
|
compare the leaves, the colour of the stamens and even the size and shape of the petals.
|
REPLY
|
|
I agree. It's incorrect.
|
REPLY
|
|
it was purchased from Vintage Gardens about 8 years ago. do you have any idea what it is? it has moderate rebloom.
|
REPLY
|
|
It looks to have a strong species connection. I'm surprised it's remontant. It reminds me of the Scots roses.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 8 posted
5 DEC 15 by
Hamanasu
|
It looks rather like "canary bird" to me, but I don't recall ever seeing this in the flesh, so my impression is based solely on pictures of this rose.
|
REPLY
|
|
The color seems a bit light for 'Canary Bird'. especially in that climate. It likely has a xanthina/hugonis connection. Why it repeats is the question.
|
REPLY
|
|
The Vintage Gardens Book of Roses has 2 1/2 pages of hybrid spinossimas. The description of 'Wildenfels Gelb', might match what you have.
|
REPLY
|
|
It looks a lot like 'Butterball' or something similar.
|
REPLY
|
|
Are there thorns under the leaves? R. hugonis has none there.
Vintage's 2006 catalogue, p322 carried R. hugonis.
|
REPLY
|
