|
'MORten' rose Reviews & Comments
HelpMeFind's future is in your hands - Please do not take this unique resource for granted.
Your support of HelpMeFind is urgently needed. HelpMeFind, like all websites, needs funding to survive. We have set a premium-membership yearly subscription amount as low as possible to make user-community funding viable.
We are grateful to the many members who have signed up so far, but the number of premium-membership members remains too small for us to sustain the current support and development level. If you value HelpMeFind and want to see it continue we need your support too.
Yearly membership is only $2.00 per month and adds a host of additional features, and numerous planned enhancements, to take full advantage of the power and convenience of HelpMeFind. Click here to start your premium membership..
We of course also welcome donations of any amount. Click here to make a donation. Donations of $24 or more receive a thank-you gift of a 1-year premium membership.
As far as we have come, we feel HelpMeFind is still in its infancy. With your support we have so much more to accomplish.
-
-
Initial post
2 JAN 24 by
A Rose Man
This cultivar is listed as triploid in the paper 'Pollen diameter and guard cell length as predictors of ploidy in diverse rose cultivars, species, and breeding lines'
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
6 AUG 20 by
Jonathan Windham
Available from - RareFind Nursery https://www.dropbox.com/s/l6emjbv2sqlqcxu/rarefind-nursery-2020_download.pdf?dl=0/index.html
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
22 JUL 18 by
JasonSims1984
Considering that Magnifica is probably a triploid (rugosa is diploid, Hybrid perpetuals are tetraploid), crossing a triploid with a tetraploid probably results in a tetraploid. Right? That might make Linda Campbell useful for breeding with modern tetraploid roses.
'Anytime' has a faint blue eye, and Magnifica is mauve, which would make Linda a carrier for some interesting lavender genetics.
Maybe crossing this with a triploid rugosa would give a tet, and it would be basically mostly a rugosa. Rose a Parfum De L'Hey, a triploid, might give basically a tetraploid rugosa. With some modern features. I have heard that it's not as sterile as it is said to be.
I imagine also crossing these with Eyes For You, or an Hulthemia line to bring out the eyezone and provide lavender enhancing flavone pigments. Imagine enhancing the blue eye of 'Anytime', and capturing it on a tetraploid rugosa. That would really correct a lot of issues with Blackspot.
I've heard that rugosas have rust issues in the South. In the North, though, there is no such thing as a better rose than a rugosa.
Pink Surprise or White Surprise, which incorporates bracteata genes that make them well adapted to the South, could probably fix some rust issues and they both bloom as well as any China. Pink Surprise blooms as well as mutabilis!
I have so many ideas that could revolutionize rugosa breeding. I will definitely get as many rugosas as I can. They are just so good. The plain species bloom as well as Knockout when well established, and it has a strong clove rose fragrance, and they are healthier too!
Getting a rugosa hybrid that is fully tetraploid is the first step. I'd love to use colchicine to induce some seedlings, but I don't know how to get it.
Does anyone have any thoughts?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
26 JUN 18 by
RoseBlush
Can anyone determine where the information that the rose 'Linda Campbell' is susceptible to blackspot came from ? I checked all of the HMF references and comments and did not see anything that indicated that this rose has a problem with BS.
'Linda Campbell' has been totally clean in my mountain garden for more than a decade.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
26 JUN 18 by
Patricia Routley
I checked the patent and all the photos and there was no mention of black spot. I have no idea of where it came from. Take it out Lyn - it will help keep your hand in, and we miss you.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
27 JUN 18 by
RoseBlush
Thank you for the double-check, Patricia. A second pair of eyes always helps.
|
REPLY
|
|