HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
'Nashville ™' rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 91-763
most recent 29 MAR 16 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 28 MAR 16 by Michael Garhart
Wrong parentage! :D

I have tried to look up the right parentage from many different sources. A lot of them misquote the identical parentage of the HT 'Christopher Columbus', but that is a case of one report being reproduced.

In all liklihood, this rose probably descends from something like the Mini-Poul line of roses. Poulsen/Oleson produce these dwarf roses at such a fast pace that it is hard to keep up or predict what they use. But it is evident that this rose is not the same parentage as the Meilland rose of the same name.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 29 MAR 16 by Patricia Routley
Very evident. This mutable resource of HMF is really the best way to address these inaccuracies carried forward from one reference to another. Now we just need more people like yourself to help us sort them out. Thanks again.
REPLY
Discussion id : 45-531
most recent 5 JUN 10 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 5 JUN 10 by Michael Garhart
The parentage on this Christopher Columbus (the striper with foliage that looks like it has miniature in it) seems highly confused with the parentage of the Christopher Columbus from Meilland. First, the parents of this one look like they belong to the Meilland version. They are of the same color, class mix and breeder origin. I believe that some sort of clerical had been originally made that confused the two, which has further catapulted both into having incorrect information about them. I just cannot even fathom that the listed parents of the striped version are really Coppelia 76, Ambassador and Romantica 76, which are an apricot/orange floribunda, an apricot/orange hybrid tea and a coral orange hybrid tea (respectively) all from Meilland and not Poulsen.

The patent of the striped version (POUlbico) states this:

"The present invention constitutes a new and distinct variety of shrub rose plant which originated from a controlled crossing between an unnamed seedling (non-patented) and unnamed seedling (non-patented). The two parents were crossed and the resulting seeds were planted in a controlled environment.

The new variety is named `POULbico`.

The new rose may be distinguished from its seed parent, an unnamed seedling, by the following combination of characteristics:

1. The seed parent is a floribunda rose with medium sized double flowers, while `POULbico` is a shrub rose with single flowers.

2. The seed parent has deep pink, soft pink and white striped flowers. The pink colors are stronger than those of `POULbico`. Additionally, `POULbico` displays lavender stripes, where those of the seed parent are white.

The new variety may be distinguished from its pollen parent, an unnamed seedling, created by the same inventors, by the following combination of characteristics:

1. The pollen parent is a floribunda with pink flowers, while `POULbico` is a shrub rose with striped flowers."

So, from this, we know it is seedling x seedling. This makes sense because Poulsen often uses their own proprietary seedlings as their sources in parentages. Also from this, we know that Ambassador, Coppelia 76 and Romantica 76 are not its true parents.
REPLY
Discussion id : 37-913
most recent 11 JUL 09 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 11 JUL 09 by sylviap
Available from - Orion Farm in MN
orionfarm.com
REPLY
Discussion id : 2-093
most recent 25 FEB 04 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 25 FEB 04 by Unregistered Guest
In my garden, this rose has little or no fragrance. After a moderately nice spring flush, it
sends out 5-foot+ long floppy canes that only bloom sporadically on the tips. This is my second year growing it; if it doesn't improve in one more year, it has to go. Too bad, it's extremely disease resistant. Maybe it would perform better trained as a small climber.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com