First, thanks for getting the system to find this rose when one searches for "Tequila Sunset"! Who would think to look for a rose by intentionally misspelling one of the two words in its name? And of the people who have it, who would wade through Modern Roses XI to figure out how to spell the name of a rose in order to look it up here?

Idea for improvement when the 'to do list' gets perilously short: match also "Tequila." This puts it in the company of like-colored roses when searching on that string.

BTW: I'm sure the "sounds like" solution sounded good at the time: it's a neat feature. I find, though, that when I'm looking up a lot of roses and I am successful most of the time with whatever the default control setting is, I rarely remember to use another. I hope you don't mind if some of us keep suggesting alternatives that would make the site seem easier for us to use even when there exists a solution we have not yet learned to use. ... I wonder whether it would be a great burden on computation time to have the algorithm progress from "matches" through "contains" to "sounds like" automatically? Thanks.