|
|
'Geschwinds Nordlandrose I' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
9 JUN 15 by
Hovman
|
Needs plenty of room , gets huge, and it is tip hardy even after sever winters.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Good fragrance, to my nose.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
...
Introduced in Hungary by Gräfin Marie Henriette Chotek in 1927...
Please, excuse me a short note:
Dolná Krupá, where Countess Chotek lived until 1946, was from the year 1918 in Czechoslovakia, now Slovakia and not in Austria-Hungarian Empire and even less in Hungary!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
24 NOV 10 by
 jedmar
|
Indeed, you are right. We do not have Czechoslovakia as a country. Let me see if we can change that.
|
REPLY
|
|
Probably should be the name of the State in which the rose was introduced (Czechoslovakia) and in brackets according to the time when information about this rose was placed on the HMF
(European Union - Slovakia). Because it would be too difficult to attempt any further territorial changes.
It would certainly be good to distinguish the historical Austria-Hungary (Kingdom of Hungary) and Hungary today, in some other cases.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
25 NOV 10 by
jedmar
|
How does it look now?
|
REPLY
|
|
Or:
Bred by Rudolf Geschwind (Austria-Hungary, 1884).
Introduced by Countess Marie Henriette Chotek in 1927 as 'Geschwinds Nordlandrose I'.
other information are listed below Chotek
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
26 NOV 10 by
jedmar
|
The breeders and introducers are tied to the country - that cannot be changed for a single person.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 DEC 06 by
Unregistered Guest
|
This rose is the same as the entry on "Geschwind's Norlandrose I". The correct spelling is Geschwind's Nordlandrose I. Also Geschwind's Norlandrose II should be corrected to Nordlandrose II
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
27 DEC 06 by
Cass
|
Okay....I can fix the spelling but where are the red blooms? I fear that some of these Geschwind roses are hopelessly confused.
|
REPLY
|
|
