|
'Joseph's Coat' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
11 MAR 21 by
ParisRoseLady
Available from - Stargazer Perennials www.stargazerperennials.com
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
26 DEC 20 by
Cambridgelad
Was introduced in the UK by R. Harkness & Sons.
Ref. NRS Annual 1965 p178
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
7 FEB 20 by
luby
What zone is this rose hardy to? I live in a zone 4 area,it can be 4 areas in winter without protection for the winter?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
7 FEB 20 by
Jay-Jay
Even in zone 6 it died during the winter at my place.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
8 FEB 20 by
luby
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
30 APR 20 by
Torachan
I managed to kill 2 own root roses in Zone 4/5. I decided this rose is tender.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 APR 13 by
Frhoden
I have had a rose bush I thought was Joseph's Coat but it does not seem to me to be a climber and the color of the blooms can be described as pink and yellow variance but I have never thought of it as red and yellow blends. This rose bush also never has problems with black spot or rust. I'm wondering if it is something other than Joseph's Coat?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
21 APR 13 by
Kim Rupert
There are a number of things your rose might be with those colors. Joseph's Coat is extremely prickly and can be grown as a shrub without support. Perhaps it's possible yours might be Joseph's Coat, but a very unhappy plant of it. If you can post photos of it I'm sure you would get some suggestions of others to compare it to. You should see the "add photo" tab on the right side of your posting once you've posted it under the "edit post" tab.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
25 APR 13 by
Frhoden
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
12 JUN 16 by
LaurelZ
Is this Joseph's Coat? It was supposed to be Anastasia.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
13 JUN 16 by
Kim Rupert
It doesn't appear to be Joseph's Coat to me. The foliage appears too glossy and the colors are just wrong for what I have observed over the past nearly four decades of Joseph's Coat. Does that mean it absolutely could NOT be Joseph's Coat? No. But it does mean I have never seen the rose with foliage as glossy appearing, nor with coloring as "blue-pink" as this photo appears.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
13 JUN 16 by
LaurelZ
I realized it's not thorny. I have taken another photo of it. I just looked it, not download yet. I wonder what it could be?
|
REPLY
|
|