|
|
'Lady Curzon' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
30 JAN by
 Callimarcio
|
This rose is very similar to another hybrid rugosa x gallica from the same epoch, I mean 'Rugosa Repens Rosea' (Smith, 1904). Is there any difference between those two varieties or is it the same rose ?
It could exists a mixing among collections/nurseries, so it could be great if a reliable expert could enlighten us..
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
10 FEB 19 by
rikuhelin
|
Does well in zone 3B/4A Canadian Prairie garden
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
12 FEB 17 by
Nastarana
|
"Lady Curzon' is also being sold this year, 1917, by Old Market Farm, in upstate New York., USA.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
13 FEB 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
You mean 1917... or 2017 as this year?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
13 FEB 17 by
Nastarana
|
2017! Sorry about that. I never have been much of a typist.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
13 FEB 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
I just was a bit confused, because this rose was born just a few years before the one You mentioned.
Me too still sometimes forget that we live in the twenty-first century.
I once heard someone say as she spoke about the millennium: The year nineteen two-thousand.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 SEP 11 by
Patricia Routley
|
A different breeder and slightly different parentage is mentioned in the 1950 reference.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
3 SEP 11 by
HMF Admin
|
Yes, it would be helpful for confirmation from someone.
|
REPLY
|
|
