'Little Linda' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
27 SEP 10 by
 Kathy Strong
|
This rose is a micro-miniature.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
6 APR 10 by
Kathy Strong
|
The patent shown on the main page for this rose is misplaced.
United States - Patent No: PP 4,264. It clearly does not belong to this rose.
I think it actually belongs to the rose named "Little Sir Echo."
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
7 APR 10 by
HMF Admin
|
Yes, you appear to be correct on both counts although it could also be 'Donna Faye' - why have you concluded Little Sir Echo' instead ?
And thanks for contacting us about this.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
7 APR 10 by
Kathy Strong
|
Just by looking at the description, and also the dates. Little Sir Echo is closer to the date of this submission and looked to have the darker reverse it describes.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
7 APR 10 by
HMF Admin
|
Yes, we agree but it would be nice to have proof positive. Interesting how the name is omitted from the patent. Thanks again.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
7 APR 10 by
Kathy Strong
|
This rose is completely thornless.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
26 JUL 08 by
OLEF641
|
Available from - John's Miniature Roses
|
REPLY
|
| 
