|
|
'Brite Eyes' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
28 OCT 19 by
 zlesak
|
Here is a link to the article we published characterizing the black spot resistance gene in Brite EyesTM.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01730/full
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
28 OCT 19 by
jedmar
|
Thank you, reference and link to the article added.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
2 NOV 22 by
Pay130
|
I wonder if rainbow knock out also inherits rdr4 from radtee?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
2 NOV 22 by
zlesak
|
That is a great question and I've been wondering that too. Hopefully we'll be able to determine that in the not to distant future. :0)
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
16 DEC 17 by
Daniel Alm
|
Admins, there's something wrong with the lineage database for BRITE EYES. After the 6th generation of descendants, it repeats again from the 1st to 6th generation again ad infinitum. The descendants listed in the 21st generation are the exact duplicate of the 6th generation. Either Radler inbred or back crossed everything multiple times or there's a system error. Is there a fix for that? ~Benaminh
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 8 posted
16 DEC 17 by
HMF Admin
|
We'll take a look - thanks so much for taking the time to alert us to this problem.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 8 posted
17 DEC 17 by
jedmar
|
The problem is not in the software, but in the declared parentages:
'Morning Magic' <-- RADspot <-- RADbrite <-- RADtee <-- RAD95.1016.17 <-- 'Morning Magic'
then the caroussel starts all over again! Perhaps Bill Radler can correct the error in this loop.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 8 posted
17 DEC 17 by
jedmar
|
Parentage of RADbrite is corrected, so that there is no loop any more. The only issue is that the declared parentage in PP 17'391 seems incorrect.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 8 posted
18 DEC 17 by
HMF Admin
|
Thank you jedmar.
Yes, that's true but the issue is the software allowing this error. Recording and presenting information is only half the battle on a website like HelpMeFind. Ensuring the integrity of the data requires a very significant, if not majority, of the available resources.
We will be addressing this software oversight as well as writing software to root out other instances of this type of error in our database.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#7 of 8 posted
19 DEC 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
It was in the offspring of a rose (Descendants per Generation), that I experienced the same repeating over and over until the 21rst generation.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 8 posted
25 JAN 21 by
heliotrope42
|
By the way, you all are doing some amazing work behind the scenes. Creating a lineage database is not simple or easy, I imagine. As I've found out when trying to whip up a Filemaker database for my rose seedlings. Thanks for all the hidden work you all are doing.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 8 posted
16 DEC 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
I experienced the same at another look-up. It started all over at the beginning.
Can't recall the search.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 8 posted
17 DEC 17 by
HMF Admin
|
Okay, thanks Jay-Jay.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
20 NOV 18 by
Peter Harris
|
The parentage given in PP 17,391 is correct, and it has been reinstated as of 19 Nov 2018. Spotless Gold is in the parentage of RADbrite through RADtee.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
20 DEC 18 by
Michael Garhart
|
So what do we do about RADspot?
Otherwise we have 'Inception' level genetics, and I really don't want to see that movie again o_o
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
9 MAR 16 by
raingreen
|
Is this rose susceptible to rust?
Thanks, Nate
|
REPLY
|
|
