I think there may be a question as to whether "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" and "Marlowe Soft Orange" are the same. "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" is thought to be 'Royal Sunset' (in Kim Rupert's estimation, per Anita Clevenger in her post on Gardenweb, referenced below), however when I took samples of my "Marlowe Soft Orange" to the Berkeley municipal rose garden and did comparisons of it to the two 'Royal Sunset' plants they grow there, it was clear to me that the two roses are not the same, albeit very similar (see Gardenweb topic here: http://forums.gardenweb.com/discussions/3835941/tribute-to-marlowe-soft-orange?n=20 and scroll down to comparison photos in posts 18 and 19). The most obvious difference is in the leaves, with those of "Marlowe Soft Orange" being quite matte, versus the shiny leaves of 'Royal Sunset'. So, If "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" actually is 'Royal Sunset', then it is not "Marlowe Soft Orange".

And, according to Anita Clevenger (post #12 in the same topic), her comparisons of "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" to the "Marlowe Soft Orange" on the Santa Clara University fence showed that they were not the same.

Therefore, I think that "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" should have its own HMF page, where photos of that rose can be published unambiguously, the differences between MSO and RACO discerned, and the possible ID of RACO as 'Royal Sunset' also examined. Note that there are no photos of "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" actually posted here -- it's all "Marlowe Soft Orange" (is the plant in the cemetery the only known plant of RACO?), so it's difficult to know what "Rusty's Angel's Camp Orange" actually looks like.

If indeed a climber, a very lethargic one. It also blooms often and regularly all season long, unlike many large-flowered climbers. I myself regard it as sort of a rangy bush, so far.