This one is back in my garden after a 25+ year hiatus. All the pictures posted here definately show this one at its best! It is absolutely capable of producing some absolutely huge, absolutely fragrant blooms in a lipsticky pink color that now--and even in 1973/4 when it was introduced--reads/read a little "dated." The 1970's were all about size and exhibition form and so many roses introduced in and around that time lack any fragrance so it is not difficult to see why this one got an AARS based on form, size and suprising fragrance (nothing in the parentage immediately suggests the fragrance). The down side, as I recall from growing this one in Chico, CA and Columbus, OH years ago is that these gorgeous blooms pictured here are really tough to come by---the plant, like so many that punch out those big beauties---is stingy with them and very slow to repeat. It isn't particularly vigorous, prone to blackspot by today's standards, the stems tend to be short. Now that fragrance is IN, some oldies are getting mass released again it seems and I assume it is on this basis (Bewitched is everywhere, Heirloom of all is now back at the 1st rate garden centers in Columbus not to mention every waxed and bagged retailer) but I still have to wonder about a few OTHERS that have THAT SMELL and are actually better roses in many ways (better repeat, stronger plant, both) such as Friendship (absolutely! and almost GONE!), maybe Jadis, maybe Patrician, probably Pink Peace.....at any rate, the fragrance is either very old or very new in fashion, the size is 1970's, the color is 1940's, the vigor is about 1960................if it crosses your path, catches your eye, buy it. But coddle it and hold your breath. Don' expect to see very many blooms like these posted here......................