'R. soulieana' rose reviews and comments

	Description		Photos		Lineage		Awards		References		Member Ratings		Member Comments		Member Journals		Cuttings		Gardens		Buy From

'R. soulieana' rose Reviews & Comments

My HMF:

☐ POST COMMENT

Discussion id : 122-335 most recent 27 JUN 20 HIDE POSTS

Initial post 27 JUN 20 by Wendybentall

Im new to this and the plant description refers to a previous rose, I can't seem to change the description!	REPLY

Discussion id : 93-207 most recent 13 DEC 19 SHOW ALL

Initial post 5 JUN 16 by HMF supporting member

Kim Rupert

There is conjecture the R. Soulieana grown and used by Ralph Moore may be different from the traditional Soulieana due to its ability to produce repeat flowering seedlings in the first generation. There appear to have been one or two other repeat flowering, first generation seedlings raised from it, but in Mr. Moore's hands, they were more the rule, rather than the exception. See the photo posted June 5, 2016.

Reply #1 of 6 posted 14 JUN 19 by HMF supporting member

Philip_ATX

I would concur that Moore's putative soulieana differs as well, and wonder if a separate link for Ralph's putative... or "in commerce as..." would be in order. The species should have more glaucous foliage based on my readings, and the young stems typically would have a cool grey-blue bloom covering them. Moore's putative soulieana has stems that bronze in the sun, with none of the cool coloring. Another article making a similar argument can be found here:
http://bulbnrose.x10.mx/Roses/Rose_Pictures/Rosa/R_soulieana.html

Reply #2 of 6 posted 4 DEC 19 by HMF supporting member

Patricia Routley

Reply #3 of 6 posted 4 DEC 19 by HMF supporting member

Kim Rupert

Thank you, Patricia. These offspring then need to be moved to Mr. Moore's Soulieana entry, please? Thank you! https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.62668.2 https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.76338.0 https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.41312.0 https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.30469.1	REPLY

Reply #4 of 6 posted 5 DEC 19 by HMF supporting member

Patricia Routley

Reply #5 of 6 posted 5 DEC 19 by HMF supporting member

Kim Rupert

Reply #6 of 6 posted 13 DEC 19 by HMF supporting member

Philip_ATX

Thank you!	REPLY

Discussion id : 83-397 most recent 7 NOV 19 SHOW ALL

Initial post 26 FEB 15 by HMF supporting member

Philip_ATX

I recognize the oldest two images as belonging to Rogers Plants Ltd. (i.e. they are copyrighted): http://www.rogersroses.com/gallery/DisplayBlock~bid~155~gid~15~source~gallerydefault.asp	REPLY

Reply #1 of 1 posted 26 FEB 15 by HMF supporting member

HMF Admin

Reply #2 of 1 posted 7 NOV 19 by HMF supporting member

Philip_ATX

Well, with Rogers Roses down, I'm almost wishing I'd kept my mouth shut! LOL. I really liked that resource, and notably, the way it grouped the species for research.	REPLY

Discussion id : 67-972 most recent 4 NOV 12 HIDE POSTS

Initial post 4 NOV 12 by Simon Voorwinde

Synstylae section	REPLY