|
|
'Engeline' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
27 JAN 15 by
flodur
|
According to Jürgen Weihrauch the plant shown here - all photos - is not Engeline. Engeline is not a Centifolia, it is a hybrid of 'Violacea'!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
27 JAN 15 by
 Jay-Jay
|
Maybe the photo of Jedmar is right?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
27 JAN 15 by
flodur
|
Probably not! They have confused the label at Labenz, as Weihrauch told me.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
27 JAN 15 by
Jay-Jay
|
It would be a short-cut to solve this, if Mr. Weihrauch would upload some photo's of (t)his rose himself.
If possible: flowers, buds, plant-habit, foliage, prickles, hips, etc.
The only-one selling this rose is Myrosesde. Did all the wrong plants come from them?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
28 JAN 15 by
flodur
|
I just talked to Mr. Weihrauch: He never intended to bring this rose into commerce. This was done by Labenz. Therefore he doesn't have own photos. He says, the only correct photo is the one from:
"Rose photo courtesy of myrosesde
L'age bleu Rosenpark Labenz
Uploaded 19 JUN 13"
He confirmed again, it is a seedling of 'Violacea'.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
1 FEB 15 by
jedmar
|
Parentage added and Centifolia corrected to Gallica.
|
REPLY
|
|
