HELPMEFIND PLANTS COMMERCIAL NON-COMMERCIAL RESOURCES EVENTS PEOPLE RATINGS
|
|
"Red Ethel" rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
24 APR 24 by
Patricia Routley
Guildford Nurseries, Ethel Street, Guildford, was owned by Charles Rhodes. (see 1939 advertisement photo uploaded today in “Red Ethel”. ) It is feasible that they may have stocked Alister Clark’s ‘Lady Rhodes’ <1933 rose. Does anybody have access to any of Guildford Nurseries catalogues?
‘Lady Rhodes’ was said to be of moderate height, short stems, and a lasting bloom. However, the colour was said to be “between red and pink” and “scarlet, passing to crimson carmine” with 60 petals. How many petals does “Red Ethel" have?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 6 posted
24 APR 24 by
HubertG
A quick look at Trove says that he was also Mayor of Guildford and was involved in judging rose exhibitions. One article mentions that 'Billy Boiler' grew at the nursery so it's very likely that he sold other Clark roses. I'm wondering if he might have been family to Mrs. Clark.
From the Perth 'Mirror' 7 June 1930 page 5:
"Roses there are by the hundred from the old time Gloir de Dijon and Marechal Ney [sic] to the new and perhaps more fashionable varieties. There is a grand new scarlet rose, Billy Boiler, which flowers all the year round. But space forbids telling of all the horticultural wonders."
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 6 posted
24 APR 24 by
Patricia Routley
Thanks HubertG. Alister Clark was born in 1864, so any contemporary may have been Charles Rhodes Sr.
Charles Cecil Rhodes born c1898. was the nursery owner. His mother's name was Frances Rhodes and it was his father, also Charles Rhodes who was the Mayor. The family's address was 7 Olive Street, Guildford.
From the website Guildfordanzacs: Rhodes became a noted horticulturalist in WA . He later developed extensive commercial rose gardens in Ethel Street and and another nursery in Market Street, Guildford. Rhodes wrote articles for the West Australian and was noted rosarian. C.C. Rhodes' father was a noted civic figure and was a Mayor of Guildford.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 6 posted
25 APR 24 by
Margaret Furness
You can visit the property 'Otahuna' owned by Alister Clark's brother-in-law in the south island of NZ (where I stranded a hire car on a rock - Patricia would remember the Heritage Rose roadtrip in the region). (Edited to remove an error.)
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 6 posted
25 APR 24 by
Patricia Routley
With great clarity Margaret. I recall swearing OUT ALOUD when you hit the rock and I was sitting in the back with Milton Nurse.
I think I have found a births/deaths/ marriages connection to Arthur Rhodes who was Alister Clark's brother-in-law. (brother to Edith Clark (nee Rhodes) and the lawyer for the Clark family. However, it is my first time at this stuff and I am getting bamboozled a bit. Take the following with some salt for the moment.
Arthur RHODES married Annie Elizabeth JOY Their child was
Annie Elizabeth RHODES (c1868-1936) aged 68 who died in Middle Swan, W.A.
Charles Rhodes [Sr,] (c1898-1948) married Frances ….. (....-1953). Their child was:
Charles Cecil Rhodes [Jr.] (c1898-1987) aged 89. Died at Boya, W.A.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 6 posted
25 APR 24 by
Margaret Furness
Looking at 'The Women behind the Roses', by the Govanstones (Rosenberg 2010). Arthur Heaton Rhodes and Sophia Circuit Rhodes of 'Elmwood', Christchurch, NZ had 6 children. Edith Rhodes married Alister Clark in 1888. Heaton Rhodes married Alister's sister Jessie Clark.
The contemporary baritone Teddy Tahu Rhodes may come from a different line, as his ancestors added the name Tahu (a Maori word meaning 'to set on fire') to theirs soon after arrival in NZ (early 1840s). But someone more competent in tracing families is welcome to correct me.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 6 posted
25 APR 24 by
HubertG
Regarding any possible connection between Mrs Clark and Charles Rhodes - both trees seem to have been fairly well researched and are online and although both their Rhodes lines ultimately go back to Yorkshire, I can't see any connection between the two families going back to the early 18th century at least.
Charles Rhodes (1874 -1948) was a Fellow of the Royal Horticultural Society according to the newspapers, so considering that and his surname it's still possible that Alister Clark knew of him, and it would be nice to think that he sent roses over to him. Upon being appointed Mayor of Guildford in 1921 Charles Rhodes tendered his resignation as inspector for the Agricultural Department of the Swan district. Both he and his son Charles Cecil Rhodes are listed as "Nurseryman"at the same address in the 1931 Swan Electoral roll.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
16 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
Would those who grow the bush ‘Etoile de Hollande’ please take a look at the photos of “Red Ethel ”. Any information on the arrangement of the pistil and stamens would help a great deal too.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 8 posted
17 NOV 21 by
HubertG
I used to grow 'Etoile de Hollande' years ago and, although my memory it isn't good enough to comment on its pistil and stamens, I remember flowers usually coming little more than semi-double with broad, rather rounded outer petals like in the photographs here of Hurley's 'Australian Rose Growing for Amateurs' and the 'Womens Weekly'. I guess my overall impression is that Red Ethel isn't what I grew as Etoile de Hollande, although I do look at some of the photographs in European and American catalogues and wonder if it came more well formed in cooler conditions. It did have a wonderful strong sweet scent.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 8 posted
17 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
Thank you HubertG, There seemed to be some inconsistency in the number of petals in ‘Etoile de Hollande’ (1925-43 reference).
Peter Ellis in Perth thought that ‘Etoile de Hollande’ seemed a good possibility for “Red Ethel”. There are excellent photos from Jay-Jay of ‘Etoile de Hollande’s straight thorns in Members Comments and the 1952 reference mentions straight thorns. Perhaps photos of “Red Ethel’s” canes would bring some resolution. It will be at least a year before my tiny plant produces anything to photograph. .
Ps - I am puzzled by John Nieuwesteeg comments - he wrote in the ‘Etoile de Hollande’ 2015 reference that his EdH plant is almost thornless. It may just be this rose is mostly thorny below, with bloom stems almost thornless.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 8 posted
17 NOV 21 by
Jay-Jay
Doesn't quite resemble Étoile de Hollande... Maybe Crimson Glory? A strong damask scent too and more resemblance?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 8 posted
17 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
Thank you Jay-Jay. I appreciate your thoughts. I see Hillary Merrifield listed ‘Etoile de Hollande’ in her garden and she was the person who uploaded the Perth photos of “Red Ethel” so would have known they were different roses. I will let Peter Ellis know.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 8 posted
18 NOV 21 by
jedmar
I have both EdH and CG in their climbing versions. While the blooms look similar, there are yet differences to what I see of Red Ethel. I will also add some photos to illustrate: - RE seems to have very strong reddish prickles. The bud looks globular and the not fully expanded bloom covers its inner petals in the manner of Mme Caroline Testout - In CG the prickles are much finer and the buds are somewhat ovoid. When the bloom fully expands it shows its stamens like RE - EdH has less petals, the bloom is flatter and the buds shorter
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 8 posted
18 NOV 21 by
jedmar
There were many similar dark red HTs with strong fragrance in the early 20th century. Advance search shows e.g. Crimson Queen, Dr G. Krüger, Earl Haig, Etoile de France, Hadley, Helen Gould, His Majesty, Laurent Carle, Liberty, among others. I would also add Richmond to the list. You might check which of these were available in Australia.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#7 of 8 posted
18 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
Thanks Jedmar. I’ll do that tomorrow. and add ‘Georges Laing Paul’ 1903 to the growing list. Patricia
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 8 posted
19 NOV 21 by
HubertG
Patricia, have you seen any photographs of 'Star of Queensland'? Could that be a possibilty?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
2 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
How does “Red Ethel” compare with ‘Lord Charlemont’?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
8 NOV 21 by
billy teabag
I grow both Patricia. Both are red and prickly but they are not the same. I'll go over them feature for feature and provide more detail asap.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
9 NOV 21 by
Patricia Routley
Thank you Billy. We look forward to that. I have added some possibilities to the main page. If anybody…… can discount any of these names, a short list is better than a long list.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 OCT 21 by
Rachel B
22/10/2021 Today, Peter Ellis visited Blackwood (the remainder of a c. 1920 public garden of Horace Mofflin in Darlington, WA), and identified one of the remaining original roses as Red Ethel ROR. Most of the roses in this garden were modern roses during that era, and were sourced from Hazlewood Bros. I wonder if the original ID of Red Ethel is in the catalogues?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
23 OCT 21 by
Patricia Routley
Peter Ellis is a treasure! Hazlewood would have almost certainly listed this rose, but under what name? During my lunchtime rest yesterday, I read through their 1922 catalogue and noted the following:
Novelties of 1922 Crusader 1919. Low fragrance, blooms singly, blues. Earl Haig <1921. Few thorns, solitary, center flat Francis Scott Key 1913. Long stems, 95 petals, colour seems different to “Red Ethel”. Gloire de Hollande 1918. G. Glassford 1921. Garnet red, long buds. Mrs. Henry Winnett 1917. Long strong stems Princess Victoria 1920. Orange base Souvenir de Claudius Denoyel <1920. a pillar rose The General 1920. Flushed orange Yves Druhen <1920. Long stems.
Novelties of 1921 Archie Gray <1916. Crimson, flamed scarlet Captain Georges Dessirier <1919. Long stems, spreading habit. Etoile de Hollande Firebrand 1915. Climbing, possibly a single rose. Nederland 1919. Long strong stems
General list Laurent Carle 1907 Hoosier beauty.1915. Long stems George Dickson 1912. Tall bush Rhea Reid 1906. Thornless Red Radiance. 1916. Long heavy stems C, V. Haworth 1917. Colonel Oswald Fitzgerald 1917. No fragrance Triumph 1907. Vigorous upright shrub Etoile de France 1903. Few thorns, long stems General Superior Arnold Janssen 1911. Long stems Chateau de Clos Vougeot. 1908. Spreading laterally, thornless Liberty Walter C. Clark 1917. Maroon crimson shaded black Mrs. Edward Powell 1910. Thornless, long stems Mrs. R. C. Bell 1920. Long stems, medium height. John Davison 1919. Mild fragrance H. V. Machin 1914 Chas K. Douglas 1917. Open informal blooms. Mary Countess of Ilchester 1910. “Splendid for cutting” therefore long stems? Has circular petals. Covent Garden 1919. No perfume. Cut flower, long erect stem. Edward Mawley 1911
Billy sent me down some wood of “Red Ethel” in 2017. It struck successfully and I spread it around to three other gardeners, keeping one for myself. After planting it out, the rose went backwards and disappeared. This year it has resurfaced and this makes me think it could have pernetiana blood, as do the prickles. The center ball I am seeing in Hillary’s photos of “Red Ethel” suggest either a Radiance or Mme. Caroline Testout family.
I also have a similar red prickly HT foundling that I found in two gardens: “Alice Red” and “Birte Venske No. 2” (on HelpMeFind). I wondered for a good while if it could have been Alister Clark’s ‘Mrs. Harold Brookes’, but came to the conclusion that it was perhaps not that rose. I will keep an eye on these three foundlings and compare - and suggest that other Perth members might like to read one Hazlewood catalogue each and put forward suggestions. It would be a process of elimination.
|
REPLY
|
|
|