|
|
'LENbru' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
On the Lens website the name of the rose is Bruoscella , not Bruocsella
|
REPLY
|
|
Interesting, we'll have to contact the ARS to verify their assignment of the exhibition name.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 6 posted
16 SEP 10 by
 Cass
Reply
#3 of 6 posted
16 SEP 10 by
jedmar
|
Interesting! Bruoscella and Bruocsella as the Latin form of Brussels seems to be confused many times. I have seen texts with both names interchanged. If you follow Google, ther latter is more common (932 vs. 44700 references). It would be funny if even Lens had it wrong on their website.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 6 posted
13 JAN 12 by
Jay-Jay
|
In the book Louis Lens: De elegantie en de Roos, its also written as Bruocsellla. (see publications, articles & video's in the left column of this website)
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 6 posted
14 JAN 12 by
Jay-Jay
|
Oops, sorry:...typo!
Bruocsella with two times L.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
16 JUN 10 by
AnneU
|
Per site www.everyrose.com, Bruocsella is as well known as ‘Bruxelles’ and ‘Brucella’.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
16 JUN 10 by
jedmar
|
