HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
'Comtes des Champagne' rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 110-930
most recent 23 MAY 18 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 23 MAY 18 by hortelina
A small error about the name of the rose Coniston also named Comte (without a s) de Champagne seen on the David Austin site . Great thanks
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 23 MAY 18 by Patricia Routley
Also de and not des. I cannot change the registered spelling, but I have added Austin's spelling. Thanks hortelina.
REPLY
Discussion id : 106-482
most recent 12 NOV 17 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 12 NOV 17 by Cradoc
This rose is as tough as old boots! It's survived drought, snow and the depredations of possums. It's never been sprayed nor has it been fertilised often & it's still going strong. A truly great performer here in Tasmania.
REPLY
Discussion id : 94-086
most recent 23 JUL 16 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 23 JUL 16 by Singularly Beautiful Roses
In its first year in my garden I've found this rose to be very black spot resistant.
REPLY
Discussion id : 73-199
most recent 28 JUL 13 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 24 JUL 13 by Eric Timewell
Under Buy From you say Treloar Roses sells this rose as 'Comtes des Champagne'. But this is incorrect: their website says, rightly, 'Comtes de Champagne'.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 3 posted 27 JUL 13 by jedmar
Corrected, thank you!
REPLY
Reply #2 of 3 posted 28 JUL 13 by Patricia Routley
Whatever synonym you know this rose as, if you are seeking who sells it, a HelpMefind search for any one of the four synonyms (AUSufo, Coniston, Comtes de Champagne, and Comtes des Champagne[rightly or wrongly] ) will list the nurseries (including Treloar) selling this rose.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 3 posted 28 JUL 13 by Eric Timewell
Thank you Patricia. As a matter of fact I knew the alternative names would produce the same result, as would any relational database. But the Treloar entry itself was wrong and has now happily been corrected.
REPLY
© 2020 HelpMeFind.com