In the Rosenlexikon reference of 1936, there is no mention of Lambert, and the second word- wherever it may have been written- was apparently not completely legible.

It seems plausible to me that what was interpreted as being a rose name was instead a reference to a rose from Paul's catalog... Do we know why Lambert was credited with it 40 years later? It does seem strange that Lambert would not have mentioned it had it been his own creation.

Virginia

I didn't find the name of this rose in the 1914 catalogue of Peter Lambert and P. Lambert gave always a detailed description of his new roses. It seems to be a Lambertiana rose and Jäger's Rosenlexikon gives no breeder, only ??. If the only source of information is the Sangerhausen label, it may be a confusion between Lambert and Lambertiana, that happened several years ago.

Dorothea