HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Search PostsPosts By CategoryRecent Posts 
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post today by Michael Garhart
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The new variety of Rosa hybrida Grandiflora Rose Plant of the present invention was created during May 2007 at Offenseth-Sparrieshoop, Germany by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., seed parent) of the new variety was the `MEIangele` variety (non-patented in the United States). The male parent (i.e., pollen parent) was the `KORtutu` variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 22,828).

The parentage can be summarized as follows: `MEIangele` x `KORtutu`

PP30,142
REPLY
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 2 days ago by Michael Garhart
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The new variety of Rosa hybrida Climbing Rose Plant of the present invention was created by during May 2005 at Klein Offenseth-Sparrieshoop, Germany by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., seed parent) of the new variety was the `DELeri` variety (non-patented in the United States). The male parent (i.e., pollen parent) was the (`KORgosumu`x`KORvanaber`) variety (non-patented in the United States).

[0003] The parentage can be summarized as follows:

`DELerr`(`KORgosumu`x`KORvanaber`)

-US PP Application # 20190037746

I'm assuming they mean DELeri (Nahema?)???

Whata mess.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted yesterday by Patricia Routley
Yes. It does seem messy. ‘Kiss Me Kate’ application 45. ‘Limona’ application 46.
I am not sure of Kordes code numbers can tell us anything. ‘Kiss Me Kate’ 05/2591-07. ‘Limona’ 05/2376-01.
I have added the parentages for the moment, but am unable to open the Patent applications from those numbers. Can we have the dates of the applications please (just for the record).
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted today by Michael Garhart
Weird...

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The new variety of Rosa hybrida Grandiflora Rose Plant of the present invention was created by during May 2005 at Offenseth-Sparrieshoop, Germany by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., seed parent) of the new variety was the `KORvanaber` variety (non-patented in the United States). The male parent (i.e., pollen parent) was the (unnamed seedling x `KORassenet`) variety (non-patented in the United States).

The parentage can be summarized as follows: `KORvanaber` x (unnamed seedling x `KORassenet`)


PP30,173
REPLY
most recent today HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post today by Michael Garhart
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The new variety of Rosa hybrida Hybrid Tea rose plant was created by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., the seed parent) was the product of the cross of the `STEBIGPU` variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 6,262) and `MEIMAGARMIC` variety (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,067). The male parent (i.e, the pollen parent) was the `ADHARMAN` variety (non-patented in the United States).

The parentage of the new variety can be summarized as follows: (`STEBIGPU` x `MEIMAGARMIC`) x `ADHARMAN`

PP30,207
REPLY
most recent today SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 28 AUG by Byrnes, Robert L.
Inventors: Warner, Christopher Hugh (Brockton, GB)
Application Number: 15/330310

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0004] The seed parent is the unpatented variety referred to as Rosa hybrid `Gelber Engel`. The pollen parent is the unpatented variety referred to as Rosa hybrid `Westheitz`. The new variety was discovered in June of 2007 by the inventor in a group of seedlings resulting from the 2006 crossing, in a research greenhouse in Brockton, Newport Shromshire, United Kingdom.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 8 posted 28 AUG by Patricia Routley
Do you have a Patent number Robert (rather than an application number)?
And I presume that is a U.S. Patent, rather than U.K.?
REPLY
Reply #2 of 8 posted 29 AUG by Michael Garhart
I'm still trying to figure out what Oso Easy Sunsay means.

Or just Sunsay? My label is outside and its dark out right now lol.

https://www.provenwinners.com/plants/rosa/sunsay-landscape-rose-rosa-x
REPLY
Reply #3 of 8 posted 29 AUG by Patricia Routley
Thanks. Added the parentage and the rose as 'Sunsay'.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 8 posted 4 SEP by Byrnes, Robert L.
Patricia,

That is the US Patent Application number. Proven Winners lists the plant as Suñorita™ (CHEwgewest) on their website. I could have sworn that they listed it as Sunsay the last time I was on their site.

Rob
REPLY
Reply #5 of 8 posted 4 SEP by Michael Garhart
I have an actual tag from them that says Sunsay. Maybe they're rebranding the awful name.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 8 posted 5 SEP by Patricia Routley
Thanks Rob and Michael. Yes, they certainly were listing it as 'Sunsay' when I entered the Source Notes (main page) I am actually coming around to preferring information in HelpMeFind's references, rather than these Source Notes which link to a website. The websites can change or be deleted in a nano-second. But one does have to type material for the references which does take time. I've added the synonym of Suñorita.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 8 posted 5 SEP by Michael Garhart
One can use wayback machine website for archived internet pages, but it doesn't work on certain things. for example, I can't see Pickering's old online catalogs, because they were made on some weird dynamic page, but it works on Weeks into the 1990s, because they made individual pages.


Sunorita is a better name. At least the pun makes sense.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 8 posted today by Michael Garhart
I think the pollen parent is a typo for Westzeit.
REPLY
© 2019 HelpMeFind.com