|
|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
|
Below are roses that have not been added to Handasyde McMillan & Co, Melbourne 1864 catalogue listing on HelpMeFind, either as references or introductions. Instead I have listed them in the nursery’s catalogue’s page. With no descriptions or possible mis-spellings, it is difficult to determine just which roses they were.
p8. Bishop’s Blush [?Bishop’s Provence 1848 pink]
p9. Duchesse de Angouleme H.B. -
p9. Queen Adelaide. Fr. [?Princess Adelaide (hybrid perpetual, Fontaine, 1856; or ?Belle Adelaide, pink gallica <1828]
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Below is a rose that has not been added to Charles Wyatt’s Frogmore Nursery, Fransford, Geelong, Victoria c1868 catalogue listing on HelpMeFind, either as a reference or an introduction. Instead I have listed it in the nursery catalogue’s page. With no description or a possible mis-spelling, it is difficult to determine just which rose it was.
p30. Marie Vertuner HP.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
 Du Roi
|
Did some research.
this Rose is for 99% Rosa helenae.
Thank you for your comment.
Not the first Rose I Bought with a wrong name, believe me.
Remove this image in a few days.
And replace it under Rosa helenae.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
yesterday by
jedmar
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
pminor
|
Wonderful garden. Love your philosophy of plant placement and working with natural features. I also have clay soil. And only limited success with amendments. Honestly leaves work the best just dont have enough! Also helpfuf to see full plant in situ.
Thanks
|
REPLY
|
|
