Given the parentage description on the main page ('Spotless Gold' was an F3 selection from ‘Goldilocks‘ X R. rugosa), should the parentage be listed as:
Hi Rob, the formula you give implies an uncontrolled open pollination scenario, which is not what Semeniuk meant by F3. It should denote controlled selfing, so the fully written out parentage looks more like:
{['Goldilocks' x R. rugosa (tetraploid)] x ['Goldilocks' x R. rugosa (tetraploid)]} x ['Goldilocks' x R. rugosa (tetraploid)]
No problem! I should have added that it may not have been "selfing"; it is also possible that sibling crosses were employed (the paper wasn't entirely clear on that point), although it wouldn't affect the formula.
I wish this rose would resurface. The last plant of it I knew of was at the San Jose Heritage Rose Garden. Alas, it is no longer there. Imagine the fun you could have playing with this!