HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalMember
Garden
 
Palustris
most recent 11 MAY SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 1 MAR 23 by Margaret Furness
The current owners tell me their family have grown it since 1942. The flowers are 3-5cm in diameter. They don't think it's scented, which argues against Lady Gay as an ID.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 8 posted 2 MAR 23 by Patricia Routley
Some people can smell roses. Others (like me) can’t.

There are two ‘Lady Gay’ roses listed in HelpMeFind.
Lady Gay (hybrid wichurana, Walsh, 1903) (Rosa wichuraiana Crép. synonym × Bardou Job)
Lady Gay (hybrid multiflora, Geschwind, 1905) (seedling of Crimson Rambler × Unknown)

Walsh’s rose is likely to be fragrant, because ‘Bardou Job’ was fragrant.
Geschwind’s rose is likely to not be fragrant, because Turner’s ‘Crimson Rambler’ wasn’t.

Despite Geschwind’s rose being classified as multiflora, (as is ‘Turner’s ‘Crimson Rambler’)
if the pollen parent of Geschwind’s rose was R. wichurana, the resulting offspring might look a wich as does
‘Evangeline’ and ‘Excelsa’. I wish we knew more about Geschwind’s ‘Lady Gay’.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 8 posted 6 MAR 23 by Palustris
Yes, it is true: we do not all detect fragrance in the same way. I can't detect China rose scent, but can detect the scent of most OGRs with a "damask" scent. I don't remember scent on 'Lady Gay', but it won't flower for another four months for me so can't check. I lost my own LG but know a big hedge of it an hour away. The Walsh roses that have scent that carries in the air are 'Evangeline' and 'Nokomis'.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 8 posted 27 MAR 23 by Patricia Routley
Margaret, I feel sure you have said somewhere (?private email) that “Loveday” is prickly.
Johno has sent me a 1969 Sedunarys Upper Murray Nursery catalogue. This nursery was at Loveday S.A. They listed ‘Pinkie Climbing’ which apparently is thornless.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 8 posted 27 MAR 23 by Margaret Furness
Yes wich-prickly: and once-flowering, so it's not Cl Pinkie.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 8 posted 27 MAR 23 by Patricia Routley
Thanks.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 8 posted 11 MAY by Margaret Furness
Palustris, would you please check whether Lady Gay is scented, if you can visit the hedge next month.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 8 posted 11 MAY by Palustris
It will be about six weeks before Lady Gay flowers here. I'm looking forward to the ramblers blooming.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 8 posted 11 MAY by Margaret Furness
Thank you.
REPLY
most recent 15 JAN SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 14 JUL 21 by odinthorBCD
As of time of writing, all the color photos posted are of a very pink rose. 'James Sprunt' should be some shade of crimson.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted 14 JUL 21 by Palustris
A quick check in 'The Old Rose Advisor' (by BCD) reveals two descriptions of the color of 'James Sprunt': "Carmine red just the same as its parent. (Cramoisi Superieur)"; and ";Deep cherry red flowers, rich and velvety,";

So it would seem that all the photographs provided by one person, with no provenance given for the rose, are incorrect.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted 15 JAN by odinthor
Much to my surprise, I have found one description of 'James Sprunt' which imbibes no shade of red: "Bright salmon; valuable as a pillar rose." Ferry-Morse Seed Company catalog, 1883, p. 125. My guess is that Ferry-Morse's supplier got some roses mixed up; but . . . who knows?
REPLY
most recent 6 JUL SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 7 MAY 22 by Michael Garhart
I feel confident that this rose is from Graham Thomas, or at least a near-Charles Austin descendent. I think GT is correct, though. I am unsure what else this rose could be.

Grew it when it was new, it mildewed, and I dumped it. I have had both Yellow Brick Road and Yellow Submarine for more than a decade now, and I find them far more preferable.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 6 posted 8 MAY 22 by Palustris
Are you asserting it is from Graham Thomas or from 'Graham Thomas'?
REPLY
Reply #2 of 6 posted 9 MAY 22 by Patricia Routley
Mr. Graham Thomas was not interested in breeding roses I understand. He died in 2003.
Michael would have been referring to the <2007 rose ‘Graham Thomas’.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 6 posted 9 MAY 22 by Lee H.
Patricia, I wonder then if we should reconsider his profile statement in HMF: “Rose and peony author and breeder” ?
REPLY
Reply #5 of 6 posted 9 MAY 22 by Patricia Routley
Yes of course. Breeder deleted. Thanks Lee H.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 6 posted 9 MAY 22 by Michael Garhart
Yes, sorry, from the rose of that name.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 6 posted 6 JUL by Michael Garhart
No, I said I feel like it is, not that I know it is.
REPLY
most recent 8 JUN 24 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 12 JUL 10 by kev
the rose pictured here is pink.Duc de Fitzjames is not this colour.It is a deep violet/purple and dark crimson red.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 9 posted 13 MAY 12 by MelissaPej
The 'Vintage Book of Roses' says that there are two plants in commerce called 'Duc de Fitzjames', one darker than the other. Mine is lilac pink, similar to the flowers I see in the photos. My plant came from 'La Campanella' in Italy, but I don't know where they got their mother plant. According to Vintage the darker-flowered variety is likelier to be the correct one.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 9 posted 13 MAY 12 by HMF Admin
Interesting, thanks for taking the time to sharing this insight with HelpMeFind. Just what HMF is all about - a tool to collect and disseminate gardening information to a participating online community.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 9 posted 31 JUL 18 by jedmar
La Campanella has many of their Gallicas from Cour de Commer - the collection of François Joyaux. 'Duc de Fitzjames' in commerce is often 'Mme Lauriol de Barny', a Bourbon rose.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 9 posted 3 AUG 18 by MelissaPej
I don't have 'Mme. Lauriol de Barny' in the garden and haven't seen it, at least not identified as such. I took a look at the newest page of photos of this variety on HMF, and, though I haven't made a careful comparison, right now I wouldn't swear that the rose I see in the photos isn't my 'Duc de Fitzjames'. My rose is a good tough variety with opulent blooms, coming easily from cuttings, has never reflowered later in the season, and gets some fungal disease after blooming, though not enough to do it any harm. Lanky in growth; thorny. I'm fond of it, mainly because of the very handsome blooms combined with the ability to flourish in quite poor conditions.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 9 posted 4 AUG 18 by jedmar
Melissa, it would be very helpful if you could post some photos of your 'Duc de Fitzjames' on HMF.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 9 posted 16 AUG 18 by MelissaPej
I'm a reluctant photographer (and this isn't the season anyway). I wanted to add to my description that my 'Duc de Fitzjames' sets hips, which are rounded oval, about 2cm wide and slightly longer, and smooth, the orifice not wide, sepals not persistent. They haven't matured yet so I don't know their color. A final note: my rose has long-lived canes, and suckers out, slowly and not aggressively.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 9 posted 28 MAY 24 by Emily W.
I came here to check on the color of this rose because last year it was a medium to light pink and this year it's quite dark with violet undertones. Would anyone know what would change the color.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 9 posted 8 JUN 24 by Palustris
Is this rose on its own roots or is it grafted? Sometimes the rootstock of a grafted plant will send up its own cane that would be a different color than the scion.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 9 posted 8 JUN 24 by Emily W.
It's an own root that I bought as a cutting 3 years ago from High Country Roses. As he has come into full bloom, they seemed to have lightened a little, ut still not as light as they were last year. I will try to post a picture from a few days ago.
REPLY
© 2025 HelpMeFind.com