|
|
-
-
|
this looks nothing like Sophie's Perpetual I grow or the other S.P. photos...
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
27 APR 20 by
 Jay-Jay
|
You're mistaken! First flower of the year in a drought period.
Same plant as from this photo: https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.266670
Not every real-life flower is the perfect flower one has in mind for that particular rose.
And did You take a look at ALL the photo's of this rose on HMF... You would than have noticed, that this rose shows a lot of aberration!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
27 APR 20 by
Jay-Jay
|
This-one doesn't look like Eden too: https://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.342514
But it IS Eden!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This looks like Tausendschön, not Queen Elizabeth.
|
REPLY
|
|
It is QE.
As we all know, flowers look different due to various reasons.
This photo is taken of flowers in cold, rainy weather, which is usual in Sweden, and shows how QE can look here.
There are so many QE photos on HMF showing buds and newly sprung rose flowers in warmer, dryer weather so I didn´t think it was necessary to contribute with such photo.
But please, rest assured this is QE.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
When I click on Queen Elizabeth abricot it takes me to white Queen Elizabeth. Is this correct? I was looking for the pink Queen Elizabeth.
Thanks,
Lise (Queen of Denmark)
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
17 NOV 12 by
Hortus
|
Correct name: 'Apricot Queen Elizabeth' !
|
REPLY
|
|
You are corrrect. We have 'Apricot Queen Elizabeth' listed in the HMF database as a separate rose as it was discovered by Verschuren in 1980. The white sport of 'Queen Elizabeth' was discovered by Banner in 1965. The rose page for 'White Queen Elizabeth' has been corrected.
Smiles,
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Never mind. I spelled Queen Elizabeth wrong!
Lise
|
REPLY
|
|
