|
|
johnm99 
-
-
|
Hello
I was just playing around with some searches, and find that if you look for HT before 1870 and still in commerce, a rose from Richard Huber 2004 comes up - it has 2 separate entries - HUBar and Guido A Zach.
I this isn't a huge deal, but I know people running HMF care a lot about accuracy. Don't know how this would happen, as its date is listed as 2004.
In case someone is interested.
:)
John
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
24 MAY by
jedmar
|
There was an error with the introduction date: 1004 instead of 2004!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Just stunning once it gets going. Wrapping itself around a fir tree, puts on a spectacular show. Gleaming white with yellow stamens, absolutely covered, with some repeat - one of the best of all climbers.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
In my cool coastal 8b climate, this is one of the most beautiful roses in the garden. I think it may open too quickly in hotter climates, but not here. One of the most photogenic roses have. Not the most prolific rebloom, to be fair. But one of my favourites, just bought some more. Interesting how much experiences can vary.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
I found this rose mostly balled up, rarely opened well. Most of the time it was covered with ugly balls of petals. Maybe wants a hotter climate (cool coastal zone 8b). Looks nice when it opens, but was hands down the least attractive plant in my garden. Shovel pruned.
|
REPLY
|
|
