|
|
-
-
Initial post
27 DEC 17 by
jswen
|
it likes a rugosa rose
|
REPLY
|
|
It could almost be Rosa roxburghii 'Plena'.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
27 DEC 17 by
 Marnix
|
If you look at my other Picture you can see the hips. And now I look again at this picture that leaves are strange, but I understand: that is another Rose beside this one: that leaves are from dr. E.M. Mills. And yes Dr. E.M. Mills has rugosa blood in it. But the flower is from Vivid. I did not see that when I posted this picture. Excuse me for that.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
17 NOV 17 by
jswen
|
It looks like a morden hybrid tea rose more than a portland damask.
|
REPLY
|
|
It to me resembles the opening stages of a bloom of 'Mogador'. I several times wondered if my 'Mogador' was not a HT when I say the blooms first opening.
|
REPLY
|
|
The petals are too dark and large for 'Rose du Roi' and the bloom is too high centred for a rose that should have no tea or China blood in it.
|
REPLY
|
|
'Mogador' is also known as 'Rose du Roi a Fleurs Pourpres' because someone or other supposed it to be a sport, which it clearly is not, of 'Rose du Roi'. I wouldn't know where the gardener got his plant but there is one US nursery which is notorious for making just that kind of label switching, or label not reading, mistake.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
11 OCT 17 by
jswen
|
It like a rose in Sect. Caninae more than a rugosa rose.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
11 OCT 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
I know... You're correct, but please take a look at the comment at the photo. It says: "Hips from the rootstock". So they are not from Topaz Jewel, but from the rootstock it is bud-grafted on!
Take a look too, at the other photo's I uploaded. There are the real hips of Topaz Jewel pictured too!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
28 FEB 17 by
jswen
|
It's not a chinese rose
|
REPLY
|
|
It looks a bit like a Damask or Centifolia, definitely not 'Pompon de Paris'.
|
REPLY
|
|
