|
|
-
-
|
Hulthemia is not a rose.
Hulthemia berberifolia is identical to Hulthemia persica.
R.x hulthemosa hardii was first genetic cross of hulthemia with a rose (R.clinophylla) circa 1832 by
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This image is clearly showing Rosa "Spray Cecile Brunner", the admission of proliferation supports this proposition.
|
REPLY
|
|
No doubt about this 'BA' pict for me, because 'cl CB' is in my garden too. I never seen any rose proliferation on my 'CB'. 'BA' is dull whitish-pink and 'CB' showing a true medium pink here. "Clearly" 'BA' on this pict. Because this too frequent bad look of these roses here, 'AB' was removed from my garden.
|
REPLY
|
|
As ausregister said, this photo is that of 'Spray Cecile Brunner', the rose which was incorrectly known for decades, as 'Bloomfield Abundance'.
As the original 'Bloomfield Abundance' has now been discovered by Judy Dean, this file, as per the Note on the main page, is now reserved for the original 'Bloomfield Abundance' rose. Would you like to reassign your photo to 'Spray Cecile Brunner' or shall I do it?
I am sorry, I do not know what rose you are referring to when you abbreviate - AB.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This also is an image of Rosa "Spray Cecile Brunner" as can be seen from the elongated and serrated sepals.
|
REPLY
|
|
