First of all, I love this site and was happy to join as a paying member.

My question is why, at the end of so many of your rose descriptions, from Austins to Hybrid Teas to Climbers, is the Scanniello quote below added at the end? It describes what are called tree roses or "standard" roses, although many or most of the varieties to which this description is added are not available in tree form.

It isn't a huge problem, but it seems strange to me. Here is the quote:

"[From A Year of Roses, by Stephen Scanniello, pp. 146-147:] Tree roses, also called standard roses, are often displayed to their best advantage when planted in containers... Tree roses come in heights anywhere from two feet high (most common with miniature roses) to over six feet. There are two forms of standard roses available. One if the common form of a long stem supporting a bushy display of roses, sort of like a large lollipop. The other is a weeping standard, the only style I think worth using.

Tree roses are created by attaching three buds of a rose cultivar to a long straight stem of another rose. The most common stem stock to use is an unnamed rugosa rose variety. Other roses have been used for creating standards, but the rugosa seems to be the strongest, surviving the longest."