|
|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
Initial post
4 days ago by
 Robert Neil Rippetoe
|
It seems odd to me, given the parentage, that this rose is rated to zone 4.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
2 days ago by
jedmar
|
It's what the patent states. We can revise according to experience.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
2 days ago by
Lee H.
|
It’s also what they say at the Proven Winners website.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 days ago by
Catarina Lund
|
This rose is ’Graciosa’ by Noack 2002.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
2 days ago by
jedmar
|
On the Roskraft website, this is listed as a hybrid tea of up to 90 cm height. Other Swedish site (Österlenrosor) also state this as a hybrid tea. 'Graciosa' by Noack is however a climber of up to 2m. The blooms are similar, but we would need some further clarification.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 days ago by
luumma
|
Rose Listing Omission
Canada Blooms from J&P
I see the entry but not the Canada Blooms from Jackson and Perkins. I wanted to upload a picture. https://www.jacksonandperkins.com/canada-blooms-hybrid-tea-rose/p/29687/?srsltid=AfmBOopYwKduQanfJCXH0CzVQQBpAts4N4Y9oSYnOiy0ATIcfO16eWTQ
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
2 days ago by
jedmar
|
This is the same 'Canada Blooms' already listed, as sold by Jackson & Perkins. See the Breeder code CA28 on the J&P site.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 days ago by
RosesOfAtropos
|
This is sold in the U.K. as ‘Duchess of Devonshire’
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
2 days ago by
jedmar
|
Synonym added, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
|
